Polymer Spray Deposition for High-Quality Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing techniques are limited in their ability to produce high-quality, complex objects with structural integrity and a broad range of thermoplastic materials, often requiring expensive and time-consuming traditional methods like injection molding for final production.

Innovation Solution

The polymer spray deposition method involves generating a spray of fluid droplets using diverging surfaces, entraining them in a carrier gas flow, and directing this flow through a multi-nozzle array to create three-dimensional objects with precise control over droplet size and direction, allowing for the use of high molecular weight polymers and other thermoplastics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional injection molding techniques are used, then high quality objects with structural integrity are produced, but the process is expensive and time-consuming with inflexible mold changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject qualityVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The injection molding process is segmented into two distinct phases: (1) rapid prototyping phase using additive manufacturing with polymer spray deposition to create low-volume prototypes and pre-production parts, and (2) high-volume production phase using traditional injection molding. This segmentation allows each method to operate in its optimal performance range, resolving the contradiction between quality and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects the appropriate manufacturing method based on production volume requirements. For low-volume needs (prototypes, pre-production), additive manufacturing is used; for high-volume needs, traditional injection molding is deployed. This dynamic approach optimizes both quality and productivity across different production stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If additive manufacturing techniques like FDM or SLS are used, then production speed and flexibility are improved, but material limitations and lower object quality result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidobject quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs pneumatic spray deposition technology where polymer materials are atomized and deposited layer-by-layer using compressed gas. This pneumatic approach enables the use of high molecular weight thermoplastic materials that were previously incompatible with additive manufacturing, achieving both rapid production and high object quality with 100% density and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes critical process parameters including polymer material molecular weight, spray deposition velocity, and layer consolidation temperature to enable the use of high molecular weight thermoplastics. These parameter changes allow additive manufacturing to produce parts with mechanical properties and structural integrity comparable to traditional injection molding while maintaining production speed and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If rapid CNC molding is used, then object quality with feature detail and finishes is improved, but expense increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detailVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses digital 3D models as copies to directly drive the polymer spray deposition process, eliminating the need for physical master patterns or expensive tooling. The digital model is sliced and used to control layer-by-layer material deposition, achieving high feature detail and surface quality at a fraction of the cost of rapid CNC molding while maintaining manufacturing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Manufacturing precision

If a multi-phase production process is used to refine prototypes before injection molding, then final product quality is improved, but time and expense increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinal product qualityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous polymer spray deposition without the need for intermediate refining steps between prototyping and production. The process continuously builds parts layer-by-layer from digital models, producing high-quality objects directly ready for production use. This eliminates the multi-phase refinement process and associated time losses while maintaining final product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the deposition parameters and using high molecular weight thermoplastic materials with controlled spray atomization, the system produces parts with 100% density and structural integrity in a single continuous process. This eliminates the need for multiple refinement phases while achieving the same or better quality outcomes, significantly reducing development time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the creation of complex, high-quality three-dimensional objects with structural integrity and feature resolution similar to traditional manufacturing techniques, while offering the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of digital additive manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

stretching the fluid between two diverging surfaces into a fluid filament until the fluid filament breaks into a plurality of droplets and forms the spray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid filament breaking: Plateau-Rayleigh Instability

Implementation Method 2

entraining the spray in a carrier gas flow, directing the carrier gas flow toward a target surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEntrainment: Entrainment

Implementation Method 3

repeatedly applying the carrier gas flow on a target surface to form the three-dimensional object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLayer-by-layer deposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS10391706B2Polymer spray deposition methods and systems
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10391706B2 patent drawing
  • US10391706B2 patent drawing
  • US10391706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of creating a three-dimensional object includes generating a spray from a fluid by stretching the fluid between two diverging surfaces into a fluid filament until the fluid filament breaks into a plurality of droplets and forms the spray, entraining the spray in a carrier gas flow, directing the carrier gas flow toward a target surface through a multi-nozzle array, and repeatedly applying the carrier gas flow on a target surface to form the three-dimensional object by controlling the direction of the carrier gas flow toward the target surface.