Polymer Supercapacitor Flexible Electrode Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current supercapacitor production methods are costly and pose health risks to workers due to the use of high surface area materials like carbon nanotubes and toxic liquid electrolytes, with a need for more efficient manufacturing and reduced worker exposure to hazardous materials.

Innovation Solution

A polymer supercapacitor device featuring a flexible electrode plate with metal oxide particles embedded in a high surface area material, encased in a polymer electrolyte coating, which reduces the risk of material shedding and provides mechanical flexibility, and a method involving aqueous metal solutions and liquid-phase polymer electrolytes for safer and more efficient assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If high surface area materials like carbon nanotubes are used to increase charge storage capacity, then the energy storage capability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and worker safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex carbon nanotubes with cheaper, easier-to-manufacture high surface area materials such as activated carbon, graphite, or carbon-coated materials. These alternative materials achieve comparable charge storage capacity without requiring the multi-phased production and assembly processes needed for carbon nanotubes, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining energy storage performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the electrode materials by using materials with different surface area to mass ratios, pore structures, and surface chemistries. This allows optimization of charge storage capacity through parameter adjustment rather than relying on complex nanotube structures, simplifying the manufacturing process while achieving the desired energy storage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If high surface area materials are used to enhance charge storage, then the energy capacity is improved, but the risk of material shedding and worker exposure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage capacityVSAvoidworker exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes hazardous high surface area materials like carbon nanotubes with safer, less toxic alternatives such as activated carbon, graphite, or carbon-coated materials. These replacement materials provide comparable charge storage capacity but pose minimal health risks, eliminating the need for specialized protective equipment and reducing worker exposure concerns while maintaining energy storage performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of material shedding into a benefit by selecting materials that naturally resist shedding and are inherently safer. The use of activated carbon, graphite, or carbon-coated materials transforms the hazard associated with high surface area materials into an advantage, as these materials provide both high charge storage capacity and reduced toxicity, protecting worker health while achieving technical performance goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Use of energy by moving object

If liquid electrolytes are used in supercapacitors, then the charge storage capability is improved, but the toxicity and corrosiveness risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage capabilityVSAvoidtoxicity and corrosiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state and chemical composition of the electrolyte by replacing liquid electrolytes with solid or gel polymer electrolytes. This parameter change maintains the ionic conductivity necessary for charge storage while eliminating the toxicity and corrosiveness associated with liquid electrolytes. The solid polymer electrolyte provides the same electrochemical function without the harmful properties, thereby improving safety while preserving charge storage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harm of using toxic and corrosive liquid electrolytes into a benefit by adopting solid or gel polymer electrolytes. These alternative electrolytes eliminate the safety hazards of liquid electrolytes while maintaining or even enhancing the charge storage capability. The solid polymer electrolyte provides inherent safety by being non-toxic and non-corrosive, transforming a hazardous system into a safe one while achieving superior electrochemical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Reliability

If complex multi-phased production processes are used for carbon nanotube fabrication, then the electrode performance is improved, but the manufacturing cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, time-consuming carbon nanotube fabrication processes with simpler, more efficient methods using readily available high surface area materials such as activated carbon, graphite, or carbon-coated materials. These materials can be manufactured through straightforward processes without requiring multi-phased production and assembly, thereby dramatically improving manufacturing efficiency and reducing costs while maintaining electrode performance through their inherent high surface area properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manufacturing parameters by selecting materials that require simpler processing conditions. Instead of complex carbon nanotube synthesis requiring precise control of temperature, pressure, and catalysts, the patent uses materials that can be processed under milder conditions with fewer process steps. This parameter change maintains the essential high surface area characteristic needed for electrode performance while eliminating the manufacturing complexity and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The polymer supercapacitor design enhances charge storage capacity, reduces material loss, and minimizes worker exposure to hazardous materials, while using safer and more easily stabilized electrolytes, improving manufacturing efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

A coating comprised of a polymer electrolyte forms a flexible layer to encase the flexible electrode plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

The flexible electrode plate is comprised of a high surface area material (HSAM) and a plurality of metal oxide particles distributed within the HSAM

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS9922776B2Polymer supercapacitor and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2018.03.20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US9922776B2 patent drawing
  • US9922776B2 patent drawing
  • US9922776B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a polymer supercapacitor and method for making such a supercapacitor. The supercapacitor is formed by loading a flexible electrode plate of a high surface area material with metal oxide particles, then encasing the electrode plate in a coating of a polymer electrolyte. The electrode plate is then folded in half and flexible plates attached to the upper and lower surfaces to form the supercapacitor.