3D Printed Polymeric Cage Structures for Apparel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing biologically relevant structural support in footwear and apparel fail to effectively accommodate complex wearer motion, lacking spatially varying properties that could benefit both injured and healthy individuals.

Innovation Solution

The integration of polymeric cage structures attached to substrates such as textiles or foams, where the interface between the substrate and the cage structure is adhesive-free, allowing for spatially varying properties and improved structural support through the use of printed materials and gas-containing structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional adhesive methods are used to attach structural support to substrates, then strong bonding is achieved, but the structural support cannot accommodate complex wearer motion and lacks spatially varying properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatially varying propertiesVSAvoidstructural support performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structural support is divided into discrete cage elements (struts and nodes) that can be independently configured and positioned. This segmentation allows different regions to have different mechanical properties, enabling spatially varying support characteristics that adapt to complex wearer motion patterns while maintaining overall structural integrity through the interconnected cage architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure implements local quality by varying the density, orientation, and mechanical properties of individual cage elements across different spatial locations. This allows regions of high structural support where needed while maintaining flexibility in other areas, accommodating complex wearer motion without requiring uniform adhesive bonding across the entire substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If adhesive is used to attach the cage structure to the substrate, then strong bonding is achieved, but the interface complexity and potential failure points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cage structure merges with the substrate by having cage elements directly contact and bond to the substrate surface at multiple points. This integration eliminates the need for separate adhesive layers or complex interface structures, reducing interface complexity while maintaining strong attachment through the distributed bonding points inherent in the cage architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure performs its own attachment function through the inherent bonding capability of its materials to the substrate. The structure serves both its primary structural support function and its attachment function simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate adhesive systems and reducing overall interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform structural support is provided throughout the article, then manufacturing is simplified, but the ability to accommodate complex wearer motion is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidaccommodation of wearer motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cage structure implements dynamics by allowing individual elements and regions to deform and adapt independently in response to wearer motion. The modular cage architecture enables localized flexibility while maintaining overall structural integrity, allowing the structure to dynamically accommodate complex motion patterns without requiring complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure transitions from uniform 2D or simple 3D support to a complex 3D architecture with elements extending in multiple dimensions. This dimensional complexity enables spatially varying properties and adaptive motion accommodation while still using standardized cage elements that can be manufactured using consistent processes, balancing manufacturing simplicity with functional adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of articles with enhanced structural support and adaptability, providing improved comfort and functionality by allowing for gradient properties and the use of gas-containing structures within the articles.

Implementation Method 1

allowing the material to solidify on the substrate such that the substrate is adhered to the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Implementation Method 2

The article includes a gas-containing polymeric structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas entrapment: Bubble

Data Source

PatentUS11446889B23D printed cage structures for apparel
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 KORNIT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD
  • US11446889B2 patent drawing
  • US11446889B2 patent drawing
  • US11446889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application is generally directed to articles including cage structures and related systems and methods. The cage structures have utility in footwear and apparel (e.g., articles of clothing, braces, accessories). In some cases, the article is a footwear article. In some cases, the article is an article of apparel. In some embodiments, the article includes a textile. In some embodiments, the article includes a cage structure (e.g., comprising a polymer) attached to a substrate (e.g., a textile). In some embodiments, the interface of attachment between the substrate and the cage structure is substantially free of an adhesive.