Polymeric Closure with Axial Columns for Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Molded polymeric closures for bottles lack efficient material usage, strength, and impact resistance, while also being difficult to manufacture without deformation during the molding process.

Innovation Solution

The closure design features an annular skirt with circumferentially spaced gripping knurls and axial columns, providing flexibility and energy absorption, along with reinforcing knurls on the top wall for enhanced stiffness and impact resistance, and gas-venting grooves for carbonated contents, facilitating high-speed manufacturing and efficient material use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If polymeric material is used to form molded closures, then the closures can be efficiently formed by compression molding or injection molding, but the closures lack sufficient strength and impact resistance, particularly against deformation during top-loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The closure incorporates axial columns that concentrate polymeric material in specific vertical regions, creating localized zones of enhanced strength and rigidity. These columns provide structural support where needed during ejection and top-loading, while the remaining sidewall areas maintain flexibility for manufacturing. This non-uniform distribution of material optimizes both manufacturing efficiency and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the closure sidewall is made thicker to improve strength and impact resistance, then deformation resistance improves, but material usage increases and manufacturing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation resistanceVSAvoidpolymeric material usage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than uniformly thickening the sidewall, the invention introduces axial columns that concentrate material vertically at specific circumferential positions. This creates localized structural reinforcement that provides deformation resistance during top-loading without requiring overall sidewall thickening, thus minimizing polymeric material usage while maintaining necessary strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sidewall is segmented into distinct regions: axial columns providing structural support and the spaces between columns providing flexibility. This segmentation allows the closure to use material efficiently only where structural support is needed, rather than uniformly throughout the entire sidewall, reducing overall material consumption while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the closure is designed with uniform sidewall thickness for simplicity, then manufacturing is easier, but the closure lacks the flexibility needed for high-speed ejection without deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign simplicityVSAvoidejection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure features axial columns that create localized rigid regions for structural support during ejection, while the spaces between columns provide flexible regions that allow the sidewall to deform elastically during high-speed ejection. This local differentiation of properties enables both structural integrity and manufacturing flexibility without complicating the overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If reinforcing structures are added to improve impact resistance, then strength improves, but the closure becomes more complex and harder to manufacture at high speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure is segmented into discrete axial columns rather than continuous complex geometries. These columns are simple vertical features that can be efficiently formed during injection molding or compression molding, avoiding complex tooling requirements. The segmented approach provides impact resistance through distributed structural support while maintaining manufacturing simplicity for high-speed production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design minimizes polymeric material usage, enhances impact resistance, and simplifies the manufacturing process, ensuring efficient production and performance, including improved ergonomics and resistance to deformation and doming.

Implementation Method 1

These relatively thick columns maintain a raised core temperature at the point in time that the closure is ejected from the molding process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

the thickened columns in the closure sidewall provide energy absorption features that carry the brunt of any impact load encountered during container drops

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

the annular skirt portion of the closure cap defines a plurality of circumferentially spaced, vertically extending gripping knurls on the exterior surface of the skirt portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8695821B2Closure having improved performance
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 CLOSURE SYST INT INC
  • US8695821B2 patent drawing
  • US8695821B2 patent drawing
  • US8695821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plastic closure formed from polymeric materials in accordance with the present invention is configured for enhanced performance, including enhanced strength and impact resistance. In one aspect of the present invention, the closure includes a top wall portion, and an annular, depending skirt portion which defines a plurality of circumferentially spaced, axial columns. Notably, in accordance with the illustrated embodiment, each of these axial columns is provided by a group of gripping knurls provided on the exterior of the skirt portion, with each group of the gripping knurls having relatively shallow valleys between adjacent ones of the knurls.