Implantable Medical Lead With Polymeric Stylet Tube and Softer Distal Backfill

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional implantable medical leads face challenges in steerability and pushability due to flexibility, which leads to kinking and whipping actions during insertion, and the inclusion of metal coils increases costs without adequate torsional stiffness.

Innovation Solution

The implantable medical lead features a polymeric tube with a higher durometer rating for increased torsional stiffness and a softer backfill material at the distal end to reduce whipping action, along with a polymeric stylet tube and backfill materials to enhance steerability and pushability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a metal coil is included within the polyurethane tube to prevent kinking, then the lead gains torsional stiffness, but the outside diameter increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorsional stiffnessVSAvoidoutside diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the metal coil from the lead construction entirely, extracting the problematic element that caused increased diameter and cost. Instead, a polymeric tube with enhanced mechanical properties is used to provide the necessary structural support without the drawbacks of metal coils.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive metal coils with a cost-effective polymeric tube solution. The polymeric material provides sufficient durability for the application while being significantly cheaper to manufacture and process than metal alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the lead is made flexible to follow the desired pathway, then the lead can navigate complex anatomy, but the lead becomes susceptible to kinking during insertion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepathway following capabilityVSAvoidresistance to kinking
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different mechanical properties to different regions of the lead. The polymeric tube has higher durometer rating in specific segments to provide kink resistance where needed, while maintaining overall flexibility for pathway navigation. This localized differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between flexibility and kink resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If axial rotation is applied to the stylet to change steering direction, then the distal end can be redirected, but whipping action occurs that causes loss of directional control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering controlVSAvoiddirectional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a softer backfill material in the distal end of the lead to cushion and dampen the whipping action that occurs during stylet rotation. This softer material absorbs the mechanical energy that would otherwise cause directional instability, providing beforehand protection against loss of control during steering maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Ease of operation

If a stylet with bent end is used to steer the lead, then directional control is achieved, but the conventional lead structure does not adequately respond to stylet manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesteerabilityVSAvoidresponsiveness to stylet
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the lead structure, specifically using a polymeric tube with higher durometer rating and softer backfill material. These parameter changes make the lead more responsive to stylet manipulation while maintaining adequate structural support, directly addressing the lack of responsiveness in conventional leads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves the ability to control and insert the lead effectively, reducing kinking and whipping actions while maintaining cost-effectiveness by using polymeric materials instead of metal coils, thus enhancing the implantability of medical leads.

Implementation Method 1

a polymeric tube with a higher durometer rating, and thus a greater torsional stiffness, than the outer lead body to provide the stylet lumen and increase the pushability of the lead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsional stiffness:

Implementation Method 2

a backfill material in the distal end that is softer than the backfill material of conventional leads to reduce the whipping action that occurs at the distal end during rotation of the bent distal tip of the stylet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWhipping action reduction: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS20230364416A1Implantable medical leads, systems, and related methods with structures for aiding lead implantation
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US20230364416A1 patent drawing
  • US20230364416A1 patent drawing
  • US20230364416A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implantable medical leads include at least one of a polymeric stylet tube and/or a distal backfill material that is softer than is conventional at least in the area where a stylet bend will cause a distal bend in the lead. The polymeric stylet tube provides for improved torsional and column stiffness during insertion while the softer distal backfill material reduces a whipping action to increase the steerability and control of the lead during insertion. The softer backfill material may be provided alone or in combination with a harder distal backfill material. The softer backfill material may be provided as an insert that is encapsulated by the harder distal back fill material or may be provided as a backfill material that exists in a position adjacent to the harder backfill material.