Polymeric Sucker Rod Guide with Segmented Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sucker rod guides face challenges in maximizing wear life due to inadequate material distribution and inefficient fluid flow, leading to increased drag and pressure drops, especially in deep well applications where rods are subjected to significant stresses and fluid flow turbulence.

Innovation Solution

A polymeric rod guide with a polygonal body and longitudinally disposed blades, featuring a curved lead section and tapered planar surfaces, is designed to enhance friction and fluid flow efficiency by creating a nozzle-like configuration that maintains a stable boundary layer and reduces drag coefficients, thereby increasing the wear life and efficiency of the guide.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the cross-sectional area of fins/blades/vanes is maximized for maximum wear life, then wear resistance is improved, but fluid flow resistance increases causing increased drag and pressure drops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear lifeVSAvoiddrag and pressure drops
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The rod guide body is segmented into multiple discrete blades arranged circumferentially around the rod. This segmentation allows fluid to pass through the gaps between blades, reducing pressure drops and drag while maintaining sufficient blade material for wear protection. The segmented structure optimizes the balance between wear resistance and fluid flow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blades are designed with non-uniform thickness distribution, featuring thicker sections at the leading edges and tips where wear occurs most frequently, and thinner sections in the middle portions. This local quality variation maximizes wear life in critical areas while minimizing overall material volume to reduce fluid flow resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If a polygonal cross-section body is used instead of cylindrical, then manufacturing precision and fixed contact with rod are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixed contact with rodVSAvoidbody geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rod guide body employs a polygonal cross-section (typically triangular or quadrangular) rather than a symmetric cylindrical shape. This asymmetric geometry provides fixed contact points with the rod, preventing rotation and ensuring precise positioning. The asymmetric form is straightforward to manufacture using conventional molding techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of manufacture

If blades with planar longitudinal side walls are used, then manufacturing ease is improved, but fluid flow efficiency deteriorates due to turbulence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade geometryVSAvoidfluid flow turbulence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The leading edges of the blades are designed with curved, rounded profiles rather than sharp angles. This curvature smooths fluid flow transitions, reduces turbulence, and minimizes pressure drops. The curved leading edges are easy to manufacture using standard molding processes while significantly improving fluid flow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly reduces pumping force requirements, stabilizes fluid flow, prevents turbulence, and extends the life of the rod guide by maintaining a high-speed boundary layer and minimizing pressure drops, resulting in improved efficiency and longer wear life.

Implementation Method 1

The curved surface defined by a tangent to the mid-point of the curved surface having an angle of between 5 and 20 degrees measured between a line parallel to the longitudinal axis of the rod and the tangent to the curved surface 35 of the lead section 34

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer: Boundary Layer

Data Source

PatentUS9926754B2Sucker rod guide
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 TENARIS CONNECTIONS BV
  • US9926754B2 patent drawing
  • US9926754B2 patent drawing
  • US9926754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A polymeric rod guide for a sucker rod, said polymeric rod guide having a body surrounding and coaxial with the sucker rod and molded in fixed contact with the rod. The body having a polygonal cross-section and a plurality of blades longitudinally disposed and extending from the body, each blade having a pair of planar longitudinal side walls and an exterior longitudinal edge, each of said blades having a first blade face disposed between a first terminal end of the blade and the exterior longitudinal edge and a second blade face disposed between a second terminal end of the blade and the exterior longitudinal edge, and an area of the body between the longitudinal side wall of a first blade and the longitudinal side wall of an adjacent second blade defines a trough having a plurality of planar surfaces.