Polymerization Unit Heat Exchanger Reactor System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ionic polymerization processes, particularly cationic polymerization of olefins using Friedel-Crafts catalysts, face limitations such as stringent manufacturing conditions, cooling inhomogeneity, and reduced efficiency due to the tubular reactor design, which leads to preferential coolant passages and dead zones, resulting in suboptimal molecular weight distribution and heat transfer.

Innovation Solution

A polymerization unit with a shared heat exchanger reactor system (HERS) featuring unidirectional parallel flow paths for both reaction mixture and coolant, with a coolant loop that is not in direct contact with the reaction mixture, allowing for controlled temperature differences and improved heat transfer, and a design that enables separate introduction of reactants and catalysts, reducing preferential passages and dead zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If tubular reactor design is used for ionic polymerization, then heat transfer area is increased, but cooling inhomogeneity occurs due to preferential coolant passages and dead zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer areaVSAvoidcooling inhomogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple parallel channels (typically 3-5 channels) instead of using a single tubular reactor. Each channel has its own coolant passages, which segments the coolant flow and eliminates dead zones. This segmentation ensures uniform heat distribution and prevents the cooling inhomogeneity that occurs in tubular reactors while maintaining adequate heat transfer area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If tube and shell reactor with multitude of tubes is used, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity and operational restrictions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex tube and shell structure with multitude of tubes is extracted and replaced with a simplified plate-based reactor design. The plate reactor maintains effective heat transfer through optimized plate geometry and coolant channel configuration, while eliminating the manufacturing complexity and operational restrictions associated with numerous small tubes. This extraction of the essential heat transfer function from the complex tubular structure resolves the contradiction between heat transfer efficiency and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If recirculating loop reactor is used for ionic polymerization, then reaction control is improved, but pressure drop increases due to extensive piping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction controlVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor design merges the reaction zone and heat exchange functions into a single integrated plate structure, eliminating the need for extensive external piping required in recirculating loop reactors. The plates provide both reaction surfaces and coolant channels within the same compact unit, allowing for effective reaction control while minimizing pressure drop by reducing the length and complexity of piping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Area of stationary object

If coolant flow is divided across whole cross-sectional section, then cooling coverage is improved, but preferential passages create cooling inhomogeneity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling coverageVSAvoidcooling inhomogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The plate reactor design implements local quality optimization by configuring coolant channels to flow adjacent to each reaction channel in a systematic pattern. This ensures that each local region of the reactor receives appropriate cooling proportional to its heat generation, preventing preferential passages and dead zones. The local coolant flow distribution is optimized through the plate geometry to match the local heat transfer requirements, achieving uniform cooling across the entire cross-section without creating inhomogeneity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances energy efficiency, achieves a narrow molecular weight distribution, and improves heat transfer efficiency, allowing for better control of the polymerization reaction, reducing reactor size and pressure drop while maintaining homogeneous reaction conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a polymerisation unit with a shared heat exchanger reactor system (HERS) featuring unidirectional parallel flow paths for both reaction mixture and coolant, with a coolant loop that is not in direct contact with the reaction mixture, allowing for controlled temperature differences and improved heat transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP3858874B1Polymerisation unit and polymerisation process
Publication Date: 2024.06.05 INEOS EUROPE AG
  • EP3858874B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3858874B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3858874B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to processes and apparatus useful for (fast) ionic polymerisation of liquid monomer(s) containing reaction mixture for the production of the corresponding polymer(s).