Polyolefin Pyrolysis Integration with Steam Cracker

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for recycling polyolefins from plastic waste through pyrolysis are energy-intensive and yield low levels of light olefin monomers, making it challenging to create a circular recycling path for polyolefins, as they often result in mixed olefin products unsuitable for polymer synthesis.

Innovation Solution

Integrating polyolefin pyrolysis with a steam cracking process train, optimizing pyrolysis conditions such as heating rates and separation stages, and incorporating contaminant removal stages to produce high yields of ethylene and propylene monomers, which can then be separated and used to form polymer-grade olefin fractions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional pyrolysis methods are used to convert plastic waste to energy, then energy production is achieved, but light olefin monomer yield is low and energy usage is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight olefin monomer yieldVSAvoidenergy usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing pyrolysis conditions including heating rate (100-1000°C per second), temperature (400-900°C), and residence time (0.1-10 seconds) to maximize light olefin monomer yield while minimizing energy consumption. These parameter optimizations enable selective production of ethylene and propylene from mixed polyolefin feedstocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the pyrolysis process into distinct stages: rapid heating phase, pyrolysis reaction phase, and cooling phase. This segmentation allows precise control over reaction conditions to favor light olefin formation. The process also separates different polyolefin components and manages different product fractions (gas, liquid, solid) independently to optimize monomer recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If pyrolysis is performed to recover monomers from polymeric materials, then monomer recovery is achieved, but the resulting vapor phase product is a mixture of olefins unsuitable for polymer synthesis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonomer recoveryVSAvoidolefin mixture purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts specific light olefin monomers (ethylene and propylene) from the complex pyrolysis vapor phase mixture through selective separation processes. This extraction focuses on isolating the most valuable polymer-grade monomers while removing unwanted components, achieving both high recovery and high purity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces steam as an intermediary substance during pyrolysis to facilitate monomer formation and separation. Steam acts as a heat transfer medium and reaction participant that promotes cracking while preventing coking, and also serves as a carrier gas that aids in transporting and separating light olefin monomers from heavier products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If rapid heating is applied to pyrolyze polyolefins, then pyrolysis efficiency is improved, but process complexity and capital requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepyrolysis efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical heating systems with a simplified rapid heating approach using electric heaters or heat exchangers that can deliver extremely high heating rates (100-1000°C per second). This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while achieving superior pyrolysis efficiency and selectivity for light olefins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces energy usage and capital costs while achieving high yields of ethylene and propylene monomers, enabling the direct conversion of polyolefins to light olefin monomers, thereby facilitating a more efficient circular recycling process.

Implementation Method 1

exposing a feedstock including a mixture of polyolefins to polyolefin pyrolysis conditions to form a pyrolysis effluent. The polyolefin pyrolysis conditions can include heating the feedstock at a rate of 100° C. per second or more to form a heated reaction mixture having a temperature of 500° C. to 900° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

cooling the heated reaction mixture to a temperature of less than 500° C. to form the pyrolysis effluent, so that the heated reaction mixture is at a temperature of 500° C. or more for 0.1 seconds to 5.0 seconds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuenching: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS20240368476A1Light Olefin Recovery from Plastic Waste Pyrolysis
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US20240368476A1 patent drawing
  • US20240368476A1 patent drawing
  • US20240368476A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for integration of a reactor for polyolefin pyrolysis with the effluent processing train for a steam cracker. The polyolefins can correspond to, for example, polyolefins in plastic waste. Integrating a process for polyolefin pyrolysis with a steam cracker processing train can allow a mixture of polymers to be converted to monomer units while reducing or minimizing costs and/or equipment footprint. This can allow for direct conversion of polyolefins to the light olefin monomers in high yield while significantly lowering capital and energy usage due to integration with a steam cracking process train. The integration can be enabled in part by selecting feeds with appropriate mixtures of various polymer types and/or by limiting the volume of the plastic waste pyrolysis product relative to the volume from the steam cracker(s) in the steam cracking process train. By selecting plastic waste and/or other polyolefin sources with an appropriate mixture of polyolefins as the feedstock, the resulting polyolefin pyrolysis product can be separated in a steam cracking process train to produce separate fractions for various polymer grade small olefin products.