Gas-Phase Polyolefin Reactor Transition Using High-Flow Reactant Bypass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas-phase polyolefin reactors face challenges in rapidly transitioning between polyolefin products, resulting in significant production of off-grade material during transitions due to slow molecular weight adjustments and physical property changes.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a high-flow valve and empirical model to rapidly adjust reactant component concentrations, such as hydrogen, monomer, co-monomer, co-catalyst, or catalyst modifier, within the reactor, allowing for faster molecular weight changes and minimizing off-grade production by predicting and controlling the transition endpoint.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the flow rate of reactant components (hydrogen, monomer, co-monomer) is changed gradually to control molecular weight and physical properties, then the product quality is maintained, but the transition period is extended and off-grade material production increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidtransition period
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations using an empirical model to predict the exact amount of reactant component needed for transition. This allows the operator to pre-determine the transition parameters before initiating the change, enabling a more aggressive and controlled transition that reduces off-grade production while maintaining product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the actual amount of reactant component added during transition and compares it against the predicted amount from the empirical model. This feedback mechanism allows for real-time adjustments to ensure the transition completes at the optimal endpoint, minimizing off-grade material while maintaining product specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the reactant component flow rate is increased rapidly to shorten transition time, then the transition period is reduced, but the control precision and product quality may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition periodVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The empirical model calculates the precise amount of reactant component required for transition before the process begins. This preliminary determination allows operators to implement rapid flow rate changes with confidence, knowing the exact transition endpoint, thereby shortening transition time without sacrificing product quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time monitoring of reactant component addition provides feedback to verify that the rapid transition is proceeding as predicted by the empirical model. This enables aggressive transition strategies while maintaining quality control through continuous verification against target parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If traditional control methods are used to transition between products, then operational stability is maintained, but off-grade material production increases due to extended transition periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational stabilityVSAvoidoff-grade material production
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an empirical model to pre-calculate the optimal transition parameters and reactant component requirements before initiating the transition. This allows for stabilized, controlled transitions that minimize off-grade production while maintaining operational reliability through predictable, data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring and feedback during the transition process to verify that the empirical model predictions are being met. This feedback mechanism ensures operational stability by detecting and correcting deviations from the planned transition path, thereby minimizing off-grade material production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the transition period and minimizes off-grade material production, thereby decreasing operational costs and ensuring consistent product quality by enabling rapid and precise adjustments to molecular weight and physical properties.

Implementation Method 1

The present invention takes advantage of the ability to diffuse a reactant component in a gas-phase polyolefin reactor to rapidly affect the physical properties of the polyolefin powder produced by increasing concentrations of reactant components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP4016219A1Method for rapid transitioning of polyolefin processes from one product to another
Publication Date: 2022.06.22 INEOS USA LLC
  • EP4016219A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4016219A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4016219A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for transitioning a gas-phase polyolefin reactor system. The gas phase polyolefin reactor system comprises - a gas phase polyolefin reactor (160), - a heat exchanger (170), - a separator tank (175), and - a compressor (150). An input stream (105) comprising a reactant component is supplied from a header to the gas-phase polyolefin reactor (160) through a steady state control valve (110) or through a bypass valve (115) and a high-flow valve (130). During normal operation the input stream (105) comprising the reactant component is directed through a steady-state control valve (110) to the low-pressure side of the compressor (150). During a transition the input stream (105) comprising the reactant component is passed to the reactor through the by-pass valve (115) and the high flow valve (130) to the high pressure side of the compressor (150).