Polyolefin Undercut Features Demolding with High Hardness Adhesive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Molding of undercut features often results in deformation or breakage due to the difficulty in demolding without applying excessive force, as they impede withdrawal from the mold cavity, and existing methods require complex tooling or compromise on the integrity of the polymer.

Innovation Solution

A multilayer structure is created with a first layer of polyolefin having undercut features, a second layer of adhesive with a Shore D hardness greater than 59 for interlocking with the undercut features, and a third layer of substrate, where the adhesive layer is disposed between the first and third layers, allowing for demolding at a rate of at least 150 mm/min and maintaining the elastic nature of the polymer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional molding methods are used for undercut features, then the polymer can be molded, but demolding causes deformation or breakage due to inability to withdraw without excessive force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemolding qualityVSAvoidfeature integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the mold into multiple separable parts (mold halves with cavity portions) that can be independently moved. This segmentation allows the undercut feature to be released from one mold half while the other remains stationary, enabling demolding without deforming or breaking the feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention makes the mold structure dynamic by allowing one mold half to move relative to the other during the demolding process. The movable mold half transitions from a closed position (for molding) to an open position (for demolding), creating the necessary space to withdraw undercut features without damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If multiple mold parts are used to demold undercut features, then demolding is facilitated, but tooling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemolding easeVSAvoidmold complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is segmented into two main halves with cavity portions, where each half contains some of the undercut features. This segmentation enables selective opening of the mold to access specific features without requiring complete disassembly of the entire mold assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

One mold half is made movable relative to the other, creating a dynamic demolding mechanism. This allows the mold to transition between closed and open states, facilitating easy removal of undercut features while maintaining a relatively simple overall mold structure compared to fully disassemblable molds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If hook shapes are used for undercut features, then demolding is enabled through bending, but the hooks bend or break under lower force compared to other undercut feature shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemolding capabilityVSAvoidforce resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mold incorporates a movable half that dynamically opens to create demolding space, allowing undercut features to be withdrawn without bending or breaking. This dynamic approach eliminates the need for the feature itself to deform during demolding, preserving its structural integrity and force resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the mold into separable halves, the invention enables direct withdrawal of undercut features without requiring them to bend like hook shapes. The features maintain their original geometry and strength characteristics while still allowing easy demolding through the segmented mold structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3046757B1Articles having a multilayer structure including undercut features interlocked with an adhesive, and methods of making same
Publication Date: 2018.05.16 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • EP3046757B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~3
  • EP3046757B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5C
  • EP3046757B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

Articles are provided, having a multilayer structure including (a) a first layer formed from polyolefin and including undercut features formed on and extending from an integral backing; (b) a second layer including an adhesive having a Shore D hardness of greater than 59 when cured; and (c) a third layer including a substrate. The second layer is interlocked with the undercut features, the third layer is adhered to the adhesive, and the second layer is disposed between the first layer and the third layer. A method is also provided including (a) depositing a polyolefin resin into a mold cavity to form a first layer including undercut features; (b) demolding the first layer from the mold cavity at a rate of at least 150 millimeters per minute; (c) applying a curable adhesive to the undercut features to form a second layer attached to the first layer; and (d) attaching a third layer including a substrate to the second layer.