Polyp Detection Edge Extraction in Endoscopic Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical image analysis methods, such as those used in endoscopic devices, rely heavily on subjective interpretation and lack objective criteria for detecting intraluminal abnormalities like polyps, leading to variability in diagnosis accuracy.

Innovation Solution

An image analysis device and method that includes edge extraction processing to identify edges in intraluminal images and determine whether they correspond to abnormal tissue based on edge line and pixel data, using techniques like Sobel filters, Hildich methods, and Catmull-Rom curves to enhance polyp detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If subjective interpretation by doctors is used for diagnosis, then diagnostic flexibility is maintained, but diagnosis accuracy and objectivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis accuracyVSAvoidimage analysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an image analysis device as an intermediary between the endoscopic image and the doctor's diagnosis. The device extracts edge information, generates possible polyp images, and provides objective diagnostic support data, thereby reducing reliance on purely subjective interpretation while maintaining diagnostic flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/subjective process of manual image interpretation with an automated image processing system that uses edge extraction algorithms and computer-generated analysis. This substitution provides objective, quantifiable diagnostic support while reducing human subjectivity in the diagnostic process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual image interpretation is used, then diagnostic flexibility is maintained, but detection precision and objectivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormal tissue detection precisionVSAvoidimage processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts edge information from endoscopic images using edge extraction processing. By isolating and analyzing only the edge portions of images, the system achieves precise abnormal tissue detection without requiring complex analysis of the entire image, thereby improving detection precision while controlling system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of image analysis from holistic visual interpretation to specific edge-based feature extraction. By focusing on edge parameters such as curvature, length, and orientation, the system achieves objective and precise measurement of abnormal tissues like polyps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive image analysis is performed, then detection accuracy improves, but processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolyp detection accuracyVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential edge information from endoscopic images, generating possible polyp images that highlight potential abnormalities. This selective extraction approach maintains high detection accuracy by focusing on critical features while significantly reducing processing time compared to comprehensive image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs partial image analysis by focusing specifically on edge regions rather than analyzing the entire image in detail. This partial action approach achieves sufficient polyp detection accuracy for clinical decision-making while minimizing processing time and computational resources required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8238629B2Image analysis device and image analysis method
Publication Date: 2012.08.07 OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)
  • US8238629B2 patent drawing
  • US8238629B2 patent drawing
  • US8238629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A CPU implements a possible polyp detection process of step S4 to execute processing for each label value of a thinned image and superimpose a processing result on a possible polyp image, thereby generating a possible polyp labeling image in which a possible polyp edge is labeled. The possible polyp labeling image, in which the possible polyp image is superimposed on an original image, is displayed on a display device so that a possible polyp location on the image can be easily checked, thereby improving the detection accuracy of an intraluminal abnormal tissue.