Polyphenylene Ether Composition for Food Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for poly(phenylene ether) compositions that exhibit improved heat resistance and notched Izod impact strength while maintaining optical properties, and these compositions must be free from certain flame retardants to be suitable for the food packaging, food service, and healthcare industries.

Innovation Solution

A composition comprising 44 to 74.9 weight percent poly(phenylene ether), 15 to 30 weight percent radial block copolymer, 7.5 to 15 weight percent polystyrene-poly(ethylene-butylene)-polystyrene triblock copolymer, 2.5 to 7.5 weight percent hydrogenated terpene resin, and 0.1 to 2 weight percent hydroxy compound, with specific molecular weight ranges and softening points, and excluding flame retardants other than those approved by the FDA, is melt-blended to achieve the desired properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If poly(phenylene ether) compositions are formulated to improve heat resistance and impact strength, then mechanical and thermal properties are enhanced, but optical properties may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotched Izod impact strengthVSAvoidoptical clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ratios of multiple components (poly(phenylene ether), radial block copolymer, polystyrene-poly(ethylene-butylene)-polystyrene triblock copolymer, hydrogenated terpene resin, and hydroxy compound) within specific weight percent ranges. This systematic parameter optimization allows the composition to achieve both improved impact strength and maintained optical clarity, resolving the contradiction between mechanical enhancement and optical property preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If flame retardants are added to improve fire resistance, then safety is enhanced, but the composition becomes unsuitable for food packaging and healthcare applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistanceVSAvoidsuitability for food packaging and healthcare
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by deliberately excluding harmful flame retardants from the composition. Instead of adding flame retardant chemicals, the formulation relies on the inherent fire resistance properties of the base polymers and additives, thereby maintaining suitability for food packaging and healthcare applications while still providing adequate fire safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fire resistance parameter by using alternative approaches - selecting specific polymers and additives with inherent fire-safe properties rather than relying on chemical flame retardants. This parameter substitution allows the composition to meet fire safety requirements without compromising food contact or healthcare application suitability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple additives are incorporated to enhance multiple properties simultaneously, then overall performance is improved, but composition complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall performanceVSAvoidcomposition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by selecting components that serve multiple purposes simultaneously. For example, the radial block copolymer contributes to both impact strength and processability, while the hydroxy compound provides both heat resistance and acts as a processing aid. This multi-functional approach enhances overall performance while limiting the number of separate additives required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple functional requirements into a unified composition system where five key components work synergistically. Rather than adding separate additives for each property (impact modifiers, heat stabilizers, processing aids), the formulation merges these functions into an integrated multi-component system with defined weight percent ranges, managing complexity through systematic combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2925807B1Poly(phenylene ether) article and composition
Publication Date: 2017.08.16 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • EP2925807B1 patent drawing
  • EP2925807B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Articles useful in the food packaging, food service, and healthcare industries are formed from a composition prepared by melt blending specific amounts of a poly(phenylene ether), a radial block copolymer of an alkenyl aromatic monomer and a conjugated diene, a polystyrene-poly(ethylene-butylene)-polystyrene triblock copolymer, a hydrogenated terpene resin, and benzoin. The composition provides optical clarity, heat resistance, and impact resistance to the articles.