Polypropylene Cap Crystallization via Sequential Polymerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing technologies for producing caps and closures face challenges in achieving rapid cycle times due to slow crystallization rates of polypropylene compositions, which hinder production efficiency and increase energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A process for producing a polypropylene composition by sequential polymerization, specifically combining loop and GPR fractions, which results in faster crystallization over a wide range of cooling rates, enabling lower cycle times in cap and closure manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional polypropylene composition is used, then production process is simple, but crystallization rate is slow leading to long cycle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle timeVSAvoidpolymerization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The polymerization process is segmented into two distinct sequential stages: first a loop reactor producing a specific polymer fraction, then a GPR reactor producing another fraction with different properties. This segmentation allows each reactor to be optimized for its specific function, achieving fast crystallization without requiring complete process redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite polypropylene material by combining two different polymer fractions (loop reactor fraction and GPR reactor fraction) with specific comonomer distributions. The resulting composite material exhibits superior crystallization kinetics that cannot be achieved with conventional single-source polypropylene

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If cooling rate is increased to reduce cycle time, then production efficiency improves, but crystallization quality may deteriorate with conventional materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle timeVSAvoidcrystallization quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental material parameters (comonomer distribution, molecular weight distribution) of the polypropylene composition through sequential polymerization. This allows the material to maintain high crystallization quality even at elevated cooling rates (100-600 K/s), enabling faster cycle times without sacrificing product quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If comonomer content is increased to improve impact properties, then mechanical strength improves, but crystallization speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact propertiesVSAvoidcrystallization speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by creating different comonomer distributions in different portions of the final product. The loop reactor fraction has low comonomer content (0.1-2.0 wt%) for fast crystallization, while the GPR reactor fraction has higher comonomer content (1.0-6.0 wt%) for improved impact properties. The synergistic combination achieves both goals simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves faster crystallization, allowing for higher cooling rates and thus shorter cycle times, enhancing production efficiency and reducing energy consumption in cap and closure production.

Implementation Method 1

by properly combining the loop and GPR fractions in a sequential polymerisation process, one can make a composition with faster crystallization over a wide range of cooling rates, especially at higher cooling rates (e.g. 100 K/s or above)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentUS12202180B2Process for preparing a cap or closure
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 BOREALIS AG
  • US12202180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for producing a cap or closure comprising obtaining a polypropylene composition by sequential polymerization comprising the steps: A) polymerizing in a first reactor, preferably a slurry reactor, in the presence of a Ziegler-Natta catalyst monomers comprising propylene and optionally one or more comonomers selected from ethylene and C4-C10 alpha-olefins, to obtain a first propylene polymer fraction having a comonomer content in the range of 0.0 to 1.8 wt %, and a MFR2 in the range of from 12.0 to 40.0 g/10 min, as measured according to ISO 1133 at 230° C. under a load of 2.16 kg; B) polymerizing in a second reactor, preferably a first gas-phase reactor, monomers comprising propylene and one or more comonomers selected from ethylene and C4-C10 alpha-olefins, in the presence of the first propylene polymer fraction, to obtain a second propylene polymer fraction, wherein the polypropylene composition comprising said first and second propylene polymer fractions has an MFR2 in the range of from 12.0 to 60.0 g/10 min, as measured according to ISO 1133 at 230° C. under a load of 2.16 kg, has a comonomer content in the range of from 2.2 to 5.0 wt % and wherein the ratio of the comonomer content of component A) to the comonomer content of the polypropylene composition is 0.35 or less, C) melting, extruding and moulding the polypropylene composition in the presence of at least one nucleating agent to prepare a cap or closure; and D) exposing the cap or closure obtained in step (C) to a cooling rate of 50 K/s or more.