Polypropylene Composite Resiliency Low Temperature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current polymerization processes for producing polypropylene materials struggle to achieve a balance between rigidity and resiliency while maintaining high productivity and avoiding catalytic system poisoning, especially at temperatures below -30°C.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the compounding of isotactic propylene polymers with poly-alpha-olefins, ethylene propylene rubbers, and nanofillers in a molten state using high shear mixing technologies and specific additives and compatibility promoters, within a temperature range of 120-230°C and rotation rates of 125-1250 rpm.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If polymerization processes are used to produce polypropylene materials, then productivity and catalytic system efficiency are maintained, but the ability to achieve both high rigidity and high resiliency at temperatures below -30°C is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidresiliency at low temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining polypropylene with elastomeric modifiers (EPDM, EPR, POE) and nanofillers (calcium carbonate, silica) to create a material that exhibits both rigidity and high resiliency at low temperatures. The composite structure allows the polypropylene matrix to provide rigidity while the elastomeric phases provide impact resistance and resiliency below -30°C.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a polyphasic material where different phases have different properties: the polypropylene matrix provides rigidity and structural integrity, while the dispersed elastomeric domains provide local resiliency and impact absorption. The nanofillers are locally distributed to enhance specific properties in targeted areas of the material structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If formulation solutions are added to improve rigidity and resiliency, then material performance is enhanced, but catalytic system poisoning and stoichiometric conversion are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidstoichiometric conversion
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the compounding of polypropylene with modifiers and nanofillers in a separate post-polymerization step. This allows the polymerization to proceed to high conversion with pure catalyst systems, and then the performance-enhancing additives are incorporated afterward through extrusion compounding, avoiding any interference with the catalytic process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the production process into two distinct stages: first, polymerization to produce polypropylene with high stoichiometric conversion and catalyst efficiency; second, compounding to add modifiers and nanofillers to achieve desired rigidity and resiliency. This segmentation allows each process to be optimized independently without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If nanofillers are used to enhance rigidity, then material strength is improved, but mixing and dispersion requirements become more demanding

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidmixing technology
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using high shear mixing parameters during the compounding process. The extrusion compounding uses high shear rates and optimized temperature profiles (120-230°C) to effectively disperse nanofillers throughout the polypropylene matrix, achieving uniform distribution without requiring overly complex mixing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by incorporating nanofillers during the extrusion compounding process along with elastomeric modifiers. The molten polymer matrix acts as an intermediary medium that facilitates the dispersion of nanofillers, and the high shear mixing conditions during extrusion provide the necessary energy for effective distribution without requiring separate specialized mixing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in high-resiliency and rigid composite materials with improved impact resistance and thermal stability, suitable for various applications including thermoforming and injection molding, while minimizing energy consumption and industrial costs.

Implementation Method 1

mixing together thermoplastic polymers of various polyolefinic nature in a molten state with the use of high friction values (high mechanical shear)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh shear mixing: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

a temperature comprised in the range of 120 - 230°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous heating: Viscous Heating

Implementation Method 3

said fillers are nanofillers having a particle size of a few tens of angstroms

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNanocomposite reinforcement: Nanocomposite

Data Source

PatentEP3172277B1High-resiliency rigid composite materials, and use and production thereof
Publication Date: 2020.06.24 G T LINE

AI summary

A process for the production of high-resiliency rigid composite material, a high-resiliency rigid composite material, and uses thereof.