Polypropylene Preform Melting Control for Liquid Blow Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Liquid blow molding using a polypropylene preform faces instability issues, with preforms prone to breakage due to unoptimized conditions for biaxial stretch blow molding with a liquid pressurizing medium.

Innovation Solution

The method involves heating the polypropylene preform to a temperature that allows stretching, using a molding die, and controlling the melting characteristics by ensuring a specific ratio of melting start temperature, peak temperature, and enthalpy (0.88-0.95) to facilitate stable molding, using a differential scanning calorimeter to measure these properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If liquid blow molding is performed using a polypropylene preform, then the filling process can be omitted and production line is simplified, but the preform may break during molding and stable molding conditions are not yet widely known

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction line efficiencyVSAvoidmolding stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical-chemical parameters of the polypropylene resin by specifying precise relationships between melting start temperature (Ts), melting peak temperature (Tm), and melting enthalpy (Hm). The formula (Tm-Ts)/Hm=0.88-0.95 defines optimal parameter ranges that ensure the resin melts controllably during liquid blow molding, preventing preform breakage while maintaining production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary characterization of the polypropylene resin properties before the actual molding process. By pre-determining the melting characteristics using the specified formula, the system prepares optimal molding conditions in advance, ensuring stable molding results without requiring extensive trial-and-error during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the melting peak is sharp (small difference between melting start temperature and melting peak temperature), then the crystalline portion reaches melting peak temperature quickly, but the melted amount increases excessively making it difficult to maintain the shape of the preform

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelting speedVSAvoidpreform shape maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the melting parameters by controlling the relationship between melting start temperature (Ts) and melting peak temperature (Tm). By ensuring (Tm-Ts) falls within a specific range defined by the formula (Tm-Ts)/Hm=0.88-0.95, the resin melts at a controlled rate that maintains preform shape while achieving necessary melting for molding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention provides a buffer against excessive melting by selecting polypropylene resins with specific melting characteristics. The controlled melting curve, defined by the parameter relationship, acts as a cushion that prevents runaway melting while ensuring sufficient melting occurs for successful molding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Strength

If the melting enthalpy is too small, then the crystalline portion melts excessively and it is difficult to maintain the shape of the preform, but when it is too large, then the crystalline portion that does not melt becomes too numerous and ruptures easily due to the preform not stretching sufficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreform strengthVSAvoidmolding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention precisely controls the melting enthalpy (Hm) parameter within a specific range defined by the formula (Tm-Ts)/Hm=0.88-0.95. This parameter optimization ensures that the crystalline portion melts to the appropriate extent - not too much to lose shape, not too little to cause rupture - achieving both sufficient strength and molding quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures stable molding without preform breakage, allowing for a wide range of molding conditions and enabling mass production with minimal rupture issues.

Implementation Method 1

when measured with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), a relationship between the melting start temperature (Ts), melting peak temperature (Tm), and melting enthalpy (Hm) of the preform 1 is (Tm-Ts)/ Hm=0.88-0.95

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential scanning calorimetry: Calorimetry

Implementation Method 2

attaching the preform 1 being heated to a temperature capable of realizing a stretching effect to a molding die

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

stretching in an expanded state by a pressurizing liquid inserted into the preform 1 by a nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure expansion: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP3210751B1Polypropylene preform
Publication Date: 2020.07.22 DISCMA AG
  • EP3210751B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3210751B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3210751B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A polypropylene preform for biaxial stretch blow molding that uses a liquid as a pressurizing medium, wherein, when measured with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), a relationship between the melting start temperature (Ts), melting peak temperature (Tm), and melting enthalpy (ΔHm) is (Tm-Ts)/ΔHm=0.60-1.00.