Polycrystalline Silicon Comminution Chisels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for comminuting silicon ingots, such as high-pressure water jets and shockwave generation, fail to produce fragments with targeted size and weight distributions, and result in shell-like fragments with high surface area and impurity levels, making manual tools like hammers the preferred choice despite their physical demands.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical crushing apparatus using opposed comminution chisels that can break down a polycrystalline silicon ingot in one stroke, preventing shell-shaped fragments and minimizing contamination, with adjustable chisel distance and drive mechanisms for precise fragment size control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional comminution methods (high-pressure water jet, shockwaves, thermal decomposition) are used, then the ingot can be comminuted into fragments, but the size and weight distributions of the fragments cannot be set in a targeted manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment size distribution controlVSAvoidtargeted size setting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus employs movable comminution tools with adjustable positions and stroke lengths, allowing dynamic control over fragment size distribution. The comminution tools can be positioned at different locations and adjusted to achieve targeted fragment sizes, resolving the contradiction between precise size control and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls fragment size distribution by adjusting parameters such as comminution tool position, stroke length, and number of strokes. These parameter changes enable targeted control over fragment size and weight distribution, addressing the inability of conventional methods to set specific size distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If jaw crushers are used for comminution, then mechanical crushing can be achieved, but shell-like fragments with large surface area and high impurity levels are formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomminution efficiencyVSAvoidimpurity levels and shell-like fragment formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the harmful shell-like outer layers through controlled comminution strokes, removing contaminated portions and producing cleaner internal fragments. This extraction principle reduces impurity levels while maintaining comminution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The comminution process uses periodic reciprocating strokes of the comminution tools, allowing controlled breaking that prevents shell-like fragment formation. The periodic action enables progressive comminution that produces more uniform, less contaminated fragments compared to continuous jaw crushing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If manual tools (hammers) are used for comminution, then fragments with good shape and very low contamination can be produced, but the work is physically very hard and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination levelsVSAvoidphysical effort required
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus enables self-service comminution where the machine performs the physically demanding task of breaking the ingot. The automated reciprocating comminution tools produce low-contamination fragments without requiring manual physical effort, resolving the contradiction between fragment quality and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces manual mechanical hammering with an automated mechanical comminution system. The machine-driven comminution tools replicate and improve upon manual hammering results while eliminating the physical labor, producing clean fragments with ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple comminution strokes are used to break down the ingot, then fragment size can be controlled, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment size controlVSAvoidcomminution cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus performs preliminary positioning of the comminution tools and preliminary strokes to create initial fragmentation patterns. This preliminary action enables faster subsequent comminution strokes to achieve precise fragment size control, reducing overall production time while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The comminution process uses continuous reciprocating strokes without idle periods, maintaining useful action throughout the comminution cycle. This continuity allows multiple strokes to be performed efficiently, achieving precise fragment size control without excessive time loss between operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus produces cubic silicon fragments with controlled size and weight distributions, reducing contamination and enabling efficient production of polycrystalline silicon for solar cells and single crystal growth with minimal physical effort and impurity levels.

Implementation Method 1

comminution chisels (3) and mating chisels (5), in front of or behind the silicon ingot (1), are moved toward one another to within a safety distance, and then a recurring striking movement is started for all the comminution chisels (3) bearing against the silicon ingot (1), effecting comminution of the silicon ingot (1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS7360727B2Apparatus and method for the mechanical comminution of semiconductor materials
Publication Date: 2008.04.22 WACKER CHEMIE AG
  • US7360727B2 patent drawing
  • US7360727B2 patent drawing
  • US7360727B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanical crushing apparatus for comminuting a polycrystalline silicon ingot, has a base and opposed comminuting and mating chisels, the chisels having longitudinal axises oriented at right angles to a longitudinal axis of the base and parallel to the surface of the base, and being movable in such a manner that a silicon ingot to be comminuted and which rests on the surface of the base can be positioned between the chisels such that all the chisels in the region of the silicon ingot are in contact with the silicon ingot, and comminution chisels in front of and behind the silicon ingot can be moved in the direction of their longitudinal axis to within a safety distance of the respective mating chisel, and the comminution chisels act on and break up the silicon ingot by means of sudden movement(s) in the direction of their longitudinal axes.