Polysilicon Ring Transistor Layout for Inkjet Printhead Area Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inkjet printing devices using the no-field oxide process face inefficiencies in transistor layout, leading to increased semiconductor area requirements, higher costs, and reduced electrical speed due to the lack of field oxide isolation, which complicates the layout and reduces packing density.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a partially etched gate NMOS transistor process, where a polysilicon ring is used to form doped regions and then partially etched to conserve silicon area and reduce manufacturing costs, allowing for a more efficient transistor layout with higher packing density and increased electrical speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If field oxide isolation is used for transistor layout, then electrical speed and packing density are improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical speedVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the field oxide isolation layer from the transistor layout, extracting only the essential gate structure components. This eliminates the complex multi-layer field oxide isolation process while maintaining adequate electrical performance through optimized gate geometry and spacing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality optimization by concentrating isolation efforts only where absolutely necessary - at the gate edges and critical transistor boundaries - rather than using comprehensive field oxide isolation across the entire device area. This localized approach reduces manufacturing steps while preserving electrical speed in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of moving object

If field oxide isolation is used for transistor layout, then packing density is improved, but manufacturing cost and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemiconductor area utilizationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the field oxide isolation process steps, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost. The simplified layout achieves adequate packing density through optimized gate structure placement and spacing without requiring the additional fabrication steps associated with field oxide formation and patterning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial isolation actions only at critical transistor boundaries and gate edges rather than comprehensive field oxide coverage. This partial approach achieves sufficient packing density for the application while significantly reducing manufacturing cost and process complexity compared to full field oxide isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If no-field oxide process is used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but transistor layout efficiency and electrical speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidelectrical speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by implementing optimized gate edge geometry and selective spacing only at critical transistor regions. This localized optimization maintains electrical speed performance in the no-field oxide process by concentrating isolation effects where they are most needed - at gate boundaries and adjacent transistor interfaces - without requiring comprehensive field oxide isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes geometric parameters of the gate structure and transistor spacing to compensate for the absence of field oxide isolation. By optimizing gate width, length, and spacing parameters, the design achieves adequate electrical speed performance in the simplified no-field oxide process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If no-field oxide process is used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but layout complexity and area requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidsemiconductor area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality optimization by implementing enhanced spacing and isolation only at critical transistor boundaries and gate edges. This localized approach achieves adequate layout efficiency and packing density in the no-field oxide process by concentrating design efforts where they are most needed, rather than requiring uniform spacing across the entire chip area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes geometric parameters including gate dimensions, transistor spacing, and layout arrangement to maximize packing density in the no-field oxide process. These parameter adjustments compensate for the lack of field oxide isolation, achieving efficient area utilization without increasing overall semiconductor area requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3039712B1Semiconductor device and method of making same
Publication Date: 2020.08.05 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • EP3039712B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3039712B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP3039712B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4B

AI summary

A semiconductor device and method of forming the same is described. In an example, a polysilicon layer is deposited on a substrate having at least one polysilicon ring. The substrate is doped using the polysilicon layer as a mask to form doped regions in the substrate. A dielectric layer is deposited over the polysilicon layer and the substrate. The dielectric layer is etched to expose portions of the polysilicon layer. A metal layer is deposited on the dielectric layer. The metal layer, the dielectric layer, and the exposed portions of the polysilicon layer are etched such that at least a portion of each polysilicon ring is removed.