Polycrystalline Silicon Rod Selection via X-Ray Diffraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for selecting polycrystalline silicon as a raw material for monocrystalline silicon production are subjective and lack quantitativeness and repeatability, leading to high rejection rates and potential dislocation issues during crystal growth.

Innovation Solution

An X-ray diffraction method is used to evaluate the degree of crystalline orientation by forming polycrystalline silicon into plate-like samples, performing in-plane rotation, and determining diffraction intensity values to select suitable polycrystalline silicon rods based on specific criteria, ensuring uniform melting and reducing dislocation generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If visual determination under optical microscope is used to evaluate polycrystalline silicon, then the evaluation process is simple and quick, but the determination results show differences depending on etching degree and observer skills, lacking quantitativeness and repeatability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process simplicityVSAvoiddetermination result consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/visual inspection system with an X-ray diffraction measurement system. Instead of using optical microscopes and human observers to evaluate polycrystalline silicon, the invention uses X-ray diffraction to obtain diffraction patterns and evaluate crystalline orientation objectively through diffraction intensity ratios, eliminating subjectivity and improving measurement precision and repeatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If acceptance criteria are set to higher level to reduce determination differences, then manufacturing yield of monocrystalline silicon increases, but rejection rate of polycrystalline silicon rods becomes higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing yieldVSAvoidrejection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the evaluation parameter from visual appearance (subjective) to crystalline orientation degree measured by X-ray diffraction (objective). By establishing quantitative acceptance criteria based on diffraction intensity ratios (e.g., I(200)/I(111) for FZ method), the invention enables precise selection of suitable polycrystalline silicon rods, reducing both false rejections and manufacturing defects, thereby optimizing both yield and rejection rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If polycrystalline silicon with acicular crystal is used as raw material, then material availability increases, but unmelted crystallites pass through melt zone as solid particles causing defect formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availabilityVSAvoidcrystal growth quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of polycrystalline silicon rods using X-ray diffraction before they are used as raw materials for monocrystalline silicon growth. By measuring the diffraction intensity ratios and comparing them against established criteria, the invention identifies and selects rods with appropriate crystalline orientation that will melt uniformly during the growth process, preventing unmelted crystallites from causing defects in the final monocrystalline product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the stable production of monocrystalline silicon by selecting polycrystalline silicon rods with low crystalline orientation, preventing local unmelted residues and dislocation, thus enhancing manufacturing yield and consistency.

Implementation Method 1

evaluating the degree of crystalline orientation of polycrystalline silicon by an X-ray diffraction method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

disposing the plate-like sample in a position where Bragg reflection from a Miller index face (100), (110), (111) or (200) is detected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBragg reflection: Bragg Diffraction

Data Source

PatentEP2863212B1Polycrystalline silicon rod selection method
Publication Date: 2021.07.21 SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD
  • EP2863212B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2863212B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2863212B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

When the degree of crystalline orientation of polycrystalline silicon is evaluated by an X-ray diffraction method, each obtained disc-like sample 20 is disposed in a position where Bragg reflection from a Miller index face <hkl> is detected and in-plane rotated at a rotational angle φ with the center of the disc-like sample 20 as the center of rotation, so that an X-ray-radiated region defined by a slit φ-scans over the principal surface of the disc-like sample 20, to determine a chart representing the dependence of the intensity of Bragg reflection from the Miller index face <hkl> on the rotational angle (φ) of the disc-like sample 20, a baseline is determined from the chart, and the diffraction intensity value of the baseline is used as an estimative index of the degree of crystalline orientation.