Polycrystalline Silicon Rod Residual Stress Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Polycrystalline silicon rods manufactured using the Siemens method often experience high residual stress due to temperature differences across their cross-section, leading to cracks and breakages during processing, which compromises product integrity and safety, and existing methods to reduce stress either lower production efficiency or require additional processing steps.

Innovation Solution

The process involves maintaining a temperature difference of 200°C or less across the cross-section of the polycrystalline silicon rod for at least an hour before completion, using a high-frequency power supply to uniform the surface temperature, and employing a dopant to adjust electrical resistivity, while growing dummy rods to radiate heat and reduce temperature gradients, thereby minimizing residual stress without significantly impacting production efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the diameter and length of polycrystalline silicon rods are increased to meet growing demand, then production capacity is improved, but the temperature difference across the cross-section increases leading to greater residual stress and more cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidrod integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the temperature difference across the rod cross-section to be 200°C or less during the deposition process. This parameter control prevents excessive thermal stress while allowing large diameter and length rods to be produced, thus maintaining both productivity and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stress or pressure

If conventional methods are used to reduce residual stress by cooling the rod, then stress is reduced, but production efficiency is significantly lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual stressVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by controlling the temperature distribution during the deposition process itself, rather than applying corrective cooling after deposition. By maintaining appropriate temperature difference (≤200°C) during growth, residual stress is prevented from forming in the first place, avoiding the need for post-processing cooling steps that would reduce productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stress or pressure

If the temperature of the surface is gradually decreased to reduce stress, then residual stress is reduced, but the reaction speed and production rate are lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual stressVSAvoidreaction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains the deposition temperature within the optimal range of 900-1200°C while controlling the temperature gradient across the cross-section to ≤200°C. This parameter optimization ensures both low residual stress and high reaction speed, avoiding the need to reduce surface temperature which would slow the deposition rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces residual stress to 22 MPa or less, minimizing the risk of cracks and breakages during processing, while maintaining production efficiency and ensuring safer handling of the rods.

Implementation Method 1

using a high-frequency power supply to uniform the surface temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh-frequency heating: Dielectric Heating

Implementation Method 2

employing a dopant to adjust electrical resistivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoping: Dopants

Implementation Method 3

growing dummy rods to radiate heat and reduce temperature gradients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 4

The surface of the inverted U-shaped silicon core wire is heated by feeding an electric current thereto until it becomes at 900 to 1200° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 5

a silane-based raw material gas is typically brought into contact with a silicon core wire being heated. Then, polycrystalline silicon is deposited on a surface of this silicon core wire with a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS20230339764A1Polycrystalline silicon rod and process of manufacturing polycrystalline silicon rod
Publication Date: 2023.10.26 SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD
  • US20230339764A1 patent drawing
  • US20230339764A1 patent drawing
  • US20230339764A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is related to a polycrystalline silicon rod manufactured with a Siemens method. The polycrystalline silicon rod having a length of 1 m or more in a longitudinal direction. An absolute value of a difference between compressive stress and tensile stress in residual stress in the longitudinal direction on a circumferential surface of the polycrystalline silicon rod is 22 MPa or less.