Polystyrene-Graphene Nanocomposite Laser Processing Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preparing polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites face challenges such as graphene agglomeration, uneven distribution, poor interfacial bonding, and high toxicity due to complex processes and low production efficiency, particularly with the use of hazardous chemicals like hydrazine hydrate.

Innovation Solution

A device and method utilizing a laser generator, vacuum chamber, ultraviolet filter, and gas flow control unit to process microstructure arrays of polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites, involving steps like mixing polystyrene microspheres with ethanol, spin-coating, vacuum drying, and precise laser processing to generate graphene with improved bonding strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional methods (solution intercalation, microsphere-covering reduction, in situ emulsion polymerization, Pickering emulsion polymerization, click chemistry, ATRP method) are used to prepare polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites, then graphene dispersibility is improved, but the procedure becomes complicated and production efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene dispersibilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical state of graphene from oxidized (graphene oxide) to reduced (graphene) by controlling the reduction process. By using in situ reduction during polymerization, the graphene is reduced and dispersed simultaneously, eliminating separate oxidation and reduction steps while maintaining good dispersibility through controlled parameter changes in the polymerization system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the graphene reduction process with the polymerization process into a single in situ reduction step. Instead of separately synthesizing graphene oxide, coating it on microspheres, and then reducing it, the reduction occurs simultaneously with polymerization, combining multiple operations into one integrated process that improves efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If graphene oxide is coated on polystyrene microspheres followed by chemical reduction, then graphene can be obtained, but the process requires multiple steps including oxidation and reduction, resulting in low production efficiency and long reaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphene coating qualityVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary functional modification of graphene oxide before the main polymerization process. By pre-functionalizing the graphene oxide with polymerizable groups and then performing in situ reduction during polymerization, the complex multi-step process is streamlined while ensuring proper graphene coating quality through the preliminary functionalization step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a continuous process where graphene oxide functionalization, microsphere formation, and reduction occur in a continuous sequence during the polymerization reaction. The useful actions are continuous rather than discrete separate steps, with the reduction occurring continuously as polymerization proceeds, eliminating idle time between operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If hydrazine hydrate is used to reduce graphene oxide to obtain graphene coated on polystyrene microspheres, then reduction is achieved, but highly toxic chemicals are used resulting in high cost and safety concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction effectivenessVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive and toxic reducing agents like hydrazine hydrate with cheaper, safer, and environmentally friendly alternatives. The use of benign reducing agents that can be easily disposed of or degraded eliminates the need for complex safety handling and disposal procedures, reducing both cost and toxicological concerns while maintaining reduction effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the typically harmful chemical reduction process into a beneficial and safe process by using environmentally friendly reducing agents. The reduction reaction that would normally require toxic chemicals is transformed into a safe process that can be performed under mild conditions, turning a harmful operation into a beneficial one that improves both safety and sustainability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient and cost-effective production of polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites with enhanced interfacial bonding and uniform graphene distribution, allowing for rapid formation of microstructure arrays with high processing efficiency and quality.

Implementation Method 1

a laser generator, a vacuum chamber, an object stage, an ultraviolet filter and a gas flow control unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

The ultraviolet filter is provided in the vacuum chamber. A laser light emitted by the laser generator arrives at the object stage located in the vacuum chamber through the ultraviolet filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltraviolet filtration: Filter (optical)

Implementation Method 3

a vacuum chamber, an object stage, an ultraviolet filter and a gas flow control unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 4

The gas flow control unit is communicated with the vacuum chamber and is configured to control the flow of the gas entering the vacuum chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow control:

Data Source

PatentUS10850304B2Method and device for processing microstructure arrays of polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 GUANGDONG UNIV OF TECH
  • US10850304B2 patent drawing
  • US10850304B2 patent drawing
  • US10850304B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for processing microstructure arrays of polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites, including a laser generator, a vacuum chamber, an object stage, an ultraviolet filter and a gas flow control unit. The object stage is detachably fixed to a bottom of the vacuum chamber with a passage that can be opened or closed. The ultraviolet filter is provided in the vacuum chamber. A laser light emitted by the laser generator arrives at the object stage through the ultraviolet filter. The object stage is configured to place a sample to be processed. The gas flow control unit is communicated with the vacuum chamber and is configured to control the flow of the gas entering the vacuum chamber. The vacuum chamber is fixed on a three-axis precision positioning platform via a vacuum chamber clamp. The device disclosed herein aims to solve the existing difficulty in processing microstructure arrays of polystyrene-graphene nanocomposites.