Polyurethane Binder for Capacitive Deionization Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current polymer binders used in carbon electrodes, such as PVDF, are costly, rigid, and environmentally unfriendly, and fail to provide optimal adhesion and electrochemical performance.

Innovation Solution

A polyurethane (PU) binder is formed by reacting a hydrophobic polyether polyol, a diisocyanate, and a diol with a hydrophobic side chain, offering improved flexibility, adhesion, and chemical stability, which is applied to capacitive deionization electrodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If PVDF binder is used to adhere electrode material particles and bind to current collector, then adhesion strength and electronic integrity are improved, but cost increases and environmental friendliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidenvironmental friendliness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the binder from PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) to polyurethane formed by reacting hydrophobic polyether polyol, diisocyanate, and diol with hydrophobic side chain. This parameter change maintains adhesion strength while improving environmental compatibility by eliminating the environmentally harmful fluorinated compounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a cost-effective polyurethane binder system that can be produced from relatively inexpensive raw materials (polyether polyol, diisocyanate, and diol) compared to expensive PVDF binder, thereby reducing overall electrode manufacturing cost while maintaining functional performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Stability of the object's composition

If PVDF binder is used to maintain electronic integrity, then electrode performance is improved, but rigidity increases and flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic integrityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the binder's physical parameters by selecting polyether polyol with specific molecular weight (affecting chain flexibility) and incorporating diol with hydrophobic side chain (affecting chain mobility). These parameter changes produce a polyurethane binder that maintains electronic integrity through adequate adhesion while providing enhanced flexibility compared to rigid PVDF.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite polyurethane binder system combining three different components (hydrophobic polyether polyol, diisocyanate, and diol with hydrophobic side chain) in specific molar ratios. This composite approach allows optimization of both electronic integrity and flexibility by leveraging the complementary properties of each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If PVDF binder is used to adhere electrode material particles, then adhesion is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadhesionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive PVDF binder with a cost-effective polyurethane binder system formed from inexpensive raw materials (polyether polyol, diisocyanate, and diol), significantly reducing material cost while maintaining adequate adhesion performance for electrode fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the molar ratios of binder components (1 part hydrophobic polyether polyol, 3-20 parts diisocyanate, and 1-6 parts diol with hydrophobic side chain) to achieve maximum adhesion performance at minimum cost, ensuring economical manufacturing without sacrificing bonding strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The PU binder enhances the adhesion strength and specific capacitance of carbon electrodes, providing better electrical conduction and ionic interaction, while being more environmentally friendly and cost-effective compared to traditional PVDF binders.

Implementation Method 1

a binder for a capacitive deionization electrode, being formed by reacting a hydrophobic polyether polyol, a diisocyanate, and a diol having a hydrophobic side chain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS10259904B2Binder for capacitive deionization electrode and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 IND TECH RES INST
  • US10259904B2 patent drawing
  • US10259904B2 patent drawing
  • US10259904B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A binder for capacitive deionization electrode is provided, which is formed by reacting a polyether polyol, a diisocyanate, and a diol having a hydrophobic side chain. The binder may bind an electrode material and to form a capacitive deionization electrode. The electrode material and the binder may have a weight ratio of 90:5 to 90:25.