Polyurethane Process Belt Fatigue Crack Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing papermaking process belts face challenges in suppressing fatigue crack growth rate, particularly when using nanoparticles, which can aggregate and limit their blending ratio, and require improved hydrophilic properties and durability.

Innovation Solution

A papermaking process belt with an integrated structure of a reinforcing fibrous base material and a polyurethane layer, where the polyurethane is formed by heat curing a curable urethane composition containing a urethane prepolymer, a curing agent, and an inorganic filler comprising 50% or more silicon oxide particles from calcined kaolin clay, fused silica, or zeolite, with surface treatment, to enhance hardness and fatigue crack resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If nanoparticles are used to improve fatigue crack resistance, then crack growth rate is suppressed, but nanoparticles aggregate and limit the blending ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue crack resistanceVSAvoidnanoparticle dispersion uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A silane coupling agent is introduced as an intermediary substance between the nanoparticles and the polyurethane matrix. The silane coupling agent modifies the nanoparticle surfaces to improve compatibility with the polyurethane, preventing aggregation and enabling higher blending ratios while maintaining uniform dispersion throughout the composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The surface properties of nanoparticles are changed through silane coupling agent treatment. This parameter change in surface chemistry enhances the interfacial adhesion between nanoparticles and polyurethane, allowing for better dispersion stability and higher permissible blending ratios without aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If inorganic filler is added to increase hardness, then wear resistance improves, but the composition complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidcomposition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inorganic filler is strategically concentrated in the outer circumferential layer where hardness and wear resistance are most critical, while the inner circumferential layer maintains a simpler composition. This local quality differentiation provides enhanced hardness where needed without unnecessarily complicating the overall composition structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

A composite material system is created by combining polyurethane with silane-modified nanoparticles and inorganic filler. This composite approach achieves the desired hardness and wear resistance through material composition rather than structural complexity, maintaining relative simplicity in the formulation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If polyurethane with high hardness is used to improve wear resistance, then crack resistance improves, but flexural fatigue resistance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidflexural fatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A composite polyurethane system is formulated incorporating silane-modified nanoparticles and inorganic filler. The nanoparticle reinforcement provides crack resistance and wear resistance, while the flexible polyurethane matrix maintains good flexural fatigue resistance, achieving a balance between hardness and flexibility that pure high-hardness polyurethane cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical properties of the polyurethane are modified by changing its composite composition. The addition of silane-modified nanoparticles and controlled inorganic filler content alters the material parameters to achieve optimal balance between hardness, wear resistance, and flexural fatigue resistance, rather than relying solely on increasing polyurethane hardness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a polyurethane process belt with significantly improved hardness and fatigue crack growth rate suppression, offering 5 to 20 times better performance than commercial belts, along with enhanced wear resistance and crack prevention.

Implementation Method 1

wherein the inorganic filler is surface-treated by a silane coupling agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSilane coupling: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

wherein one part of the polyurethane or all of the polyurethane is formed by heat curing of a curable urethane composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat curing: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP2330249B1Process belt for papermaking and method for making the same
Publication Date: 2012.10.31 ICHIKAWA CO LTD
  • EP2330249B1 patent drawingFigure 1(a)~2
  • EP2330249B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

A process belt for papermaking with a long operational life comprises an integrated structure of a reinforcing fibrous base material (6) and a polyurethane layer, the reinforcing fibrous base material (6) being embedded in the polyurethane, wherein an inorganic filler selected from calcined kaolin clay, fused silica and zeolite is homogeneously dispersed in the polyurethane.