Passive Optical Network Error Handling via Protocol Layer Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication protocols in passive optical networks silently discard data with unrecoverable errors, leading to reduced system throughput, increased latency, and loss of synchronization, which is detrimental for both real-time and non-real-time applications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a mechanism where a lower protocol layer signals error events to a higher protocol layer, allowing the higher layer to parse and recover portions of data unaffected by errors, and optionally accept control messages with invalid check codes under specific criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data with uncorrectable errors is silently discarded by lower protocol layers, then data integrity is maintained, but system throughput is reduced and latency increases due to retransmission requirements at higher layers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the lower protocol layer (physical layer) signals error events to the higher protocol layer (transmission convergence layer). This is achieved through an error indication field in the GTC frame header that provides real-time feedback about error conditions, enabling the higher layer to make informed decisions about data handling without requiring silent discarding or full retransmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables selective recovery of data by allowing the higher protocol layer to parse and extract usable portions of data frames that contain errors. Instead of discarding entire frames with errors, the system can recover valid data segments while isolating the erroneous portions, thereby maintaining throughput while preserving data integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Reliability

If retransmission protocols are implemented at higher protocol layers, then data correctness is improved, but latency increases due to timer expiration waits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correctnessVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary error detection and indication at the physical layer before data is passed to higher layers. By detecting errors early and providing immediate indication through the error field in frame headers, the system prevents the need for higher layers to implement time-consuming retransmission protocols, thereby reducing latency while maintaining correctness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If data packets are silently discarded by lower protocol layers, then error propagation is prevented, but synchronization is lost in structured data streams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror containmentVSAvoidsynchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The error indication field provides continuous feedback to the higher protocol layer about the status of received data frames. This feedback mechanism allows the higher layer to maintain synchronization by detecting error patterns and adjusting its parsing and processing accordingly, preventing synchronization loss while containing errors through informed decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission convergence layer acts as an intermediary between the physical layer and network layer. It receives error indications from the physical layer and uses this information to mediate data processing, enabling synchronization maintenance through intelligent parsing and error handling without requiring silent discarding that would disrupt synchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If the entire data stream is discarded when an error is detected, then data integrity is preserved, but system throughput is reduced by unnecessary retransmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements selective discarding and recovery by enabling the higher protocol layer to parse data frames and identify which portions are affected by errors. Valid data segments can be extracted and processed while only the erroneous portions are discarded, thereby preserving data integrity for usable data while maintaining high throughput by avoiding unnecessary discarding of error-free data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality control by allowing different portions of the data stream to be treated differently based on their error status. Error-free segments are processed normally while erroneous segments are identified and handled separately, enabling localized error containment without affecting the overall throughput of the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2692080B1Error handling in a passive optical network
Publication Date: 2018.05.09 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP2692080B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2692080B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2692080B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

When data containing an unrecoverable error is received, instead of discarding the data, a lower protocol layer delivers the data to a higher protocol layer along with an indication that the data contains an error. The higher protocol layer parses the data to recover portions that are not affected by the error. Additionally, the higher protocol layer can choose to accept the data if certain acceptance criteria are met.