Rigid Friction Covers for Automatic Pool Cleaner Disc Fins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic pool cleaner discs with flexible fins lack discussion on outwardly-extending protrusions composed of multiple pieces, adaptors to reduce friction, and mechanisms for enhanced integrated movement of fins and planar disc sections.

Innovation Solution

Separate covers made from more rigid and lower friction materials that can be placed on fins to discourage lateral bending and reduce frictional contact, with a design allowing coordinated upward movement of fins and planar disc sections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate covers are placed on fins to reduce friction and prevent lateral bending, then climbing performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclimbing performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fin structure is segmented by adding separate covers that can be placed on individual fins. These covers are removable and can be applied selectively to specific fins based on cleaning requirements, allowing the system to be divided into functional modules that can be independently configured and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The covers are applied locally to specific fins rather than uniformly to the entire disc. This allows different regions of the disc to have different friction characteristics - covered fins provide reduced friction for wall climbing, while uncovered fins maintain higher friction for gripping pool surfaces. The local application optimizes performance for specific operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If covers made from more rigid material are used on fins, then lateral bending is prevented, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fin system is segmented into the base fin structure and separate rigid covers. The covers can be manufactured independently using optimized processes for rigid materials, then assembled onto the fins. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured using the most suitable process for its specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses composite construction by combining the original fin material with separate rigid cover materials. Each material can be selected for its optimal properties - the base fins use material suitable for flexibility and attachment, while the covers use rigid materials for structural stability. This composite approach allows each component to be manufactured using processes optimized for its specific material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If covers are designed to contact both fins and planar portions, then integrated movement is enhanced, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement coordinationVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cover design allows for dynamic adaptation of the disc system. The covers can be positioned to contact both fins and planar portions, creating a coordinated movement system that adapts to different operational conditions. This dynamic configuration enables the disc to maintain stable contact with pool surfaces while allowing necessary flexibility for maneuvering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The covers act as intermediary elements between the fins and the planar portions of the disc. By contacting both elements, the covers mediate their relative movements and ensure coordinated action. This intermediary function helps synchronize the movement of different disc components, improving overall system stability during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The covers enhance the pool cleaner's ability to climb pool walls by reducing friction and preventing lateral bending, improving the cleaner's climbing performance and movement coordination.

Implementation Method 1

Versions of the covers are made from material (a) more rigid and (b) having lower coefficient of friction than the fins, hence both discouraging lateral bending of the fins and decreasing frictional contact with surfaces when certain obstacles or walls are encountered

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

Frictional contact between the fin and interior of the cover may retain the cover in place, especially (although not exclusively) when the fin has non-uniform width

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrictional fit: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2185779B1Automatic swimming pool cleaner discs and associated components
Publication Date: 2017.04.26 ZODIAC POOL CARE EURO
  • EP2185779B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2185779B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2185779B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Separate covers (10) for protruding portions of discs (14) of automatic swimming pool cleaners are addressed. The covers may be placed onto protrusions/ such as fins, and removed from the fins as needed. Version of th covers are made of material more rigid and having lower coefficient of friction than the fins to discourage lateral bending of the fins and decrease frictional contact of the fins with pool surfaces.