Automatic Pool Cover Locking Mechanism Using Submerged Hooks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manual and complex automatic locking systems for roll-up swimming pool covers are uncomfortable, prone to breakage, and aesthetically unpleasing, with magnetic and mechanical solutions experiencing errors and mismatches.

Innovation Solution

A fully automatic safety device using hooks and couplings linked to the pool walls and a motorized drum, with elastic and rigid straps, that mechanically locks and unlocks the cover, ensuring secure anchoring without manual operation and improving aesthetics by hiding components underwater.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual clamps are used to fix the cover to the pool sides, then the cover can be secured, but the operation becomes uncomfortable and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtime for mounting and dismounting
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cover system performs self-service through automatic locking and unlocking mechanisms. The cover automatically locks to the pool sides upon deployment and unlocks when retracted, eliminating the need for manual operation of clamps or fasteners by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical clamp operation with an automated mechanical system. The locking mechanism uses mechanical elements such as hooks, latches, or magnetic attachments that automatically engage with the pool sides without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If electromagnetic magnetic means are used for automatic locking, then automatic operation is achieved, but errors and undesired interactions with other electrical elements occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic lockingVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes electromagnetic locking mechanisms with purely mechanical locking systems. The mechanical locks use physical components such as hooks, latches, or clips that engage with corresponding receptacles on the pool sides, eliminating electrical elements and their associated errors or interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If complex mechanical locking elements are used for automatic operation, then automatic locking is achieved, but the structure becomes complex leading to mismatches and breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic lockingVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is segmented into simple, modular components that can be independently manufactured and assembled. The cover includes discrete locking elements at its edges that correspond to simple receptacles or attachment points on the pool sides, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs simple, easily replaceable mechanical locking components that can be manufactured at low cost. If a locking element wears or breaks, it can be quickly replaced without affecting the entire system, reducing the impact of component failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If manual clamps are used to secure the cover, then the cover is fixed, but aesthetic appearance deteriorates due to visible components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation reliabilityVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the locking components from visible areas and integrates them into the cover structure or pool architecture. The locking elements are positioned at the edges or corners of the cover, where they are less visually prominent, or are integrated into the pool's existing structure to maintain aesthetic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a reliable, automatic, and aesthetically pleasing solution for securing roll-up swimming pool covers, eliminating manual operation and potential breakages, while ensuring safety and compatibility with various pool materials.

Implementation Method 1

a first elastic strap (9) linking the drum slat (4) to the drum (3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4382697A1Safety device for roll-up swimming pool covers
Publication Date: 2024.06.12 FLUIDRA IND FRANCE
  • EP4382697A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4382697A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4382697A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Safety device for roll-up swimming pool covers, linkable to a cover comprising a rotating drum (3), a floating blanket (1) and a drum actuator (3). The blanket (1) comprises slats (2) joined together, with a drum slat (4), linkable to the drum (3) and a closing slat (5) linkable to a wall opposite the drum wall. The device comprises: - first coupling hooks (6), fixable to a submerged sector of the drum wall; - second coupling hooks (7), fixable to a submerged sector of the closing wall; - locking straps (9) and some release straps (8), linkable to the drum slat (4) and to the first coupling hooks (6); and - pivoting hooks (10), linkable to the closing slat (5) and to the second coupling hooks (7).