Pool Pump Motor Controller for Adaptive Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pool pump systems lack the ability to optimize pool conditions at setup and over time, requiring frequent adjustments to on/off schedules and motor speeds, often relying on a trial-and-error approach to achieve efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A pump motor controller that receives data on pool parameters, pump parameters, and user preferences to determine optimal speeds and run times, adjusting motor speed for maximum efficiency while maintaining desired conditions, and communicating with other pool devices to optimize operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If trial and error approach is used to schedule pump motor, then pump operation can be adjusted, but optimum pool conditions cannot be achieved efficiently and requires periodic adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump scheduling adjustmentVSAvoidperiodic adjustments time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives feedback from pool condition sensors (temperature, pH, chlorine levels) and automatically adjusts pump motor scheduling to maintain optimal conditions. This closed-loop feedback system eliminates the need for periodic manual trial-and-error adjustments by continuously monitoring pool parameters and adapting pump operation accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of pump scheduling based on automatically collected pool condition data. The controller independently determines optimal run times and speeds without requiring user intervention, thereby eliminating time loss associated with periodic manual adjustments while maintaining ease of operation through automated self-optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed schedule is used for pump operation, then operation is simple, but cannot adapt to changing pool conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to changing pool conditionsVSAvoidcontroller system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed as a multi-functional device that not only schedules pump operation but also monitors multiple pool parameters (temperature, pH, chlorine), communicates with various pool devices, and automatically adjusts scheduling based on collected data. This universal controller handles diverse functions through a single integrated system, providing adaptability to changing conditions without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pump scheduling system transitions from a static fixed schedule to a dynamic adaptive schedule that automatically adjusts run times and speeds based on real-time pool conditions. The controller continuously modifies operational parameters in response to changing conditions, enabling the system to adapt flexibly while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If manual control is used for pump motor, then system is simple, but does not provide optimum pool conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimum pool conditions maintenanceVSAvoidelectronic controller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic controller implements feedback control by continuously monitoring pool conditions through sensors and automatically adjusting pump motor operation to maintain optimal parameters. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable maintenance of optimum pool conditions by systematically responding to measured deviations, thereby improving reliability while keeping controller complexity manageable through automated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical control with an electronic control system that uses sensors, microprocessors, and automated algorithms to determine optimal pump scheduling. This substitution of manual operation with electronic automation improves the reliability of maintaining optimum conditions while the modular electronic architecture keeps the added complexity manageable and beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9951780B2Motor, controller and associated method
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 REGAL BELOIT AMERICA INC
  • US9951780B2 patent drawing
  • US9951780B2 patent drawing
  • US9951780B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment of the invention, a pump motor controller for determining the speeds and run times of a pump motor for use in a pool is provided. The controller is adapted to receive data in the form of at least one of pool parameters, pump parameter and user preferences. The controller is further adapted to determine the speeds and run times of a pump motor for use in a pool based at least in part on data in the form of one of pool parameters, pump parameter and user preferences.