Swimming Pool Safety Detection Using Multi-Sensor Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety measures fail to effectively detect and alert for unsupervised individuals, particularly children, in hazardous areas like swimming pools, leading to potential injuries and drownings due to lack of real-time monitoring and inadequate supervision detection.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using IoT-connected sensors to detect individuals in swimming pools and surrounding areas, analyzing signals from devices like cameras, sonar-based object detection, and weight sensors to identify characteristics and determine if an alert should be raised based on supervision status and pre-configured parameters, triggering notifications to prevent accidents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional safety measures are used in swimming pool areas, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but the detection precision and reliability of unsupervised individuals is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring task into multiple specialized sensor components: sonar sensors for detecting objects in water, weight sensors for detecting individuals on pool decks, and camera systems for visual verification. Each sensor type handles a specific detection aspect, improving overall detection precision while distributing system complexity across modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional sensor devices that can detect multiple types of targets and conditions simultaneously. For example, the sensor system can identify both children and pets, detect presence in water and on deck areas, and determine supervision status through integrated analysis, reducing the need for separate specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional safety measures are used in swimming pool areas, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of safety monitoring is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors sensor data and provides real-time feedback about detected individuals and their supervision status. The processor analyzes incoming signals from multiple sensors, compares them against safety criteria, and immediately triggers alerts when unsupervised individuals are detected, ensuring reliable and timely safety responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and analysis of individual characteristics (age, size, identity) before a safety incident occurs. By identifying and tracking individuals in advance and determining their supervision status proactively, the system can prepare and issue alerts before dangerous situations develop, enhancing reliability through preventive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor detection is implemented to identify individual characteristics, then the detection precision improves, but the loss of processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual identification precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a tiered detection approach where it first performs partial identification using readily available sensor data (such as basic presence detection and simple characteristics), then selectively applies more time-consuming analysis methods only when necessary. This allows rapid initial assessment while maintaining the option for detailed identification when safety concerns arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual identification processes with automated sensor-based detection and electronic processing. Instead of requiring human operators to visually identify and track individuals, the system uses sonar, weight sensors, and image processing to automatically detect, identify, and monitor individual characteristics, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining or improving identification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If real-time monitoring and alerting is implemented, then the safety effectiveness improves, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to operate autonomously without requiring constant human intervention. Sensors automatically detect individuals, the processor continuously analyzes data and determines supervision status, and alerts are triggered automatically when safety criteria are met. This self-service capability maintains high safety effectiveness while reducing the operational complexity of human monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple detection functions (presence detection, individual identification, supervision status determination, and alert generation) into an integrated safety monitoring platform. By merging these functions into a unified system with shared processing and communication infrastructure, the overall complexity is reduced compared to having separate independent systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides real-time monitoring and alerts to prevent injuries by accurately detecting unsupervised individuals and reducing false alarms through location-based and parameter-driven decision-making, enhancing safety in swimming pool environments.

Implementation Method 1

sonar-based object detection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSonar: Sonar

Implementation Method 2

weight sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeight sensing:

Data Source

PatentUS10789826B2Real-time safety detection and alerting
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 KYNDRYL INC
  • US10789826B2 patent drawing
  • US10789826B2 patent drawing
  • US10789826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Real-time detection and alerting for swimming pool safety includes obtaining signals from sensor devices installed in a swimming pool area having a swimming pool, ascertaining, based on the obtained signals, that an individual has entered the swimming pool and identifying, based on the obtained signals, characteristics of the individual who has entered the swimming pool, determining whether to raise an alert about the individual having entered the swimming pool, the determining being based at least in part on location of one or more other individuals relative to the swimming pool area and on checking pre-configured parameters for alerting, and performing processing based on the determining whether to raise an alert.