Pooled SPR Screening for High-Throughput Binder Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-throughput screening (HTS) methods for identifying compounds capable of binding to biological targets are resource-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to false positives/negatives, and SPR-based methods are limited by low throughput and high costs, making it unsuitable for large compound libraries.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pooling of compounds into samples and using sensor-based assays, specifically surface plasmon resonance (SPR), to identify compounds capable of binding to biological targets or fragments thereof, with a deconvolution analysis to determine binding values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-throughput screening (HTS) is used to screen large compound libraries, then the ability to identify binding compounds is improved, but the method becomes resource-intensive, time-consuming, and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening throughputVSAvoidscreening time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple individual compound assays are merged into a single pooled sample assay. By combining multiple compounds into one pool and testing the pool as a single unit, the method achieves high-throughput screening capability while reducing the number of individual assays required, thereby saving time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The method uses computational deconvolution analysis to create virtual representations of individual compound binding profiles from pooled data. This allows the system to infer individual compound behavior without physically testing each compound separately, effectively copying the information-gathering function at lower cost and time expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If traditional HTS methods are used, then large compound libraries can be screened, but false positives and false negatives are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening capacityVSAvoidassay accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The method implements iterative deconvolution analysis where the results from pooled samples feed back into refined identification of individual compound binders. By using the pooled data to inform subsequent analysis rounds, the system continuously improves accuracy and reduces false positives/negatives while maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The compound library is segmented into multiple pooled samples with specific compositions designed to enable mathematical deconvolution. This segmentation strategy allows the system to maintain screening capacity while creating data structures that facilitate accurate identification of true binders through computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is used for compound identification, then binding accuracy is improved, but throughput is reduced and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding detection accuracyVSAvoidscreening throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple SPR assays for individual compounds are merged into a single pooled SPR assay. By injecting a pool of compounds simultaneously through the SPR sensor, the method maintains the high measurement precision of SPR technology while achieving throughput comparable to traditional HTS, as the sensor surface is utilized more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The SPR sensor surface is designed to handle multiple functions: it can detect binding signals from pooled compounds, provide reference signals from control samples, and enable deconvolution analysis all within the same instrument run. This multi-functionality allows SPR to achieve both high precision and high throughput simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the throughput and reduces costs for screening large compound libraries, allowing for accurate identification of compounds with diverse chemical structures and complex binding properties.

Implementation Method 1

surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was introduced as a technique to identify compounds capable of binding to a biological target that is immobilized on a sensor surface. In essence, SPR is based on a change in refractive index upon binding of molecules to the biological target immobilized on a surface. This alteration in the refractive index shifts the resonance angle, which can be measured as a change in the intensity of the reflected light.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface plasmon resonance:

Data Source

PatentEP4686943A1Method of identifying one or more compounds capable of binding to a biological target
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 PROTEROS BIOSTRUCTURES
  • EP4686943A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4686943A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4686943A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a sensor-based high-throughput screening method for identifying one or more compounds capable of binding to a biological target or a fragment thereof by high-throughput screening, and a device adapted to carry out said method.