Pop Noise Control Mask for Acoustic Echo Cancellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing acoustic echo cancellation systems and noise reduction approaches fail to effectively control impulsive noise, known as pop-noise or transient noise, which can drive loudspeakers beyond their linear range, leading to nonlinear components that cannot be removed and result in strong remaining impulsive parts in error signals.

Innovation Solution

A pop noise control system that calculates and applies a pop noise removal mask by analyzing spectral signal-to-noise ratios in a specific frequency range to distinguish and suppress impulsive noise parts, while minimizing the impact on speech signals, using a combination of spectral and temporal smoothing stages and background noise estimation to create a mask that is applied to the error signal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If common acoustic echo cancellation or noise reduction approaches are applied, then general noise is reduced, but impulsive pop-noise components remain strong and unremoved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneral noise reductionVSAvoidimpulsive pop-noise components
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing strategies to different parts of the signal spectrum. A pop-noise removal mask is created specifically for low-frequency bands (below a predetermined upper frequency limit) where pop-noise typically occurs, while other frequency regions are processed using conventional noise reduction methods. This localized approach allows effective pop-noise suppression without adversely affecting other frequency components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters dynamically based on signal characteristics. By detecting impulsive components through signal-to-noise ratio analysis and determining their temporal and spectral properties, the system adjusts the pop-noise removal mask parameters (frequency limit, threshold values, smoothing factors) to adapt to varying pop-noise conditions while preserving speech quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If aggressive noise filtering is applied to remove impulsive components, then pop-noise is reduced, but speech quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpulsive pop-noise suppressionVSAvoidspeech quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic adaptation in the pop-noise removal process. The upper frequency limit for pop-noise processing, the signal-to-noise ratio thresholds, and the smoothing parameters are adjusted dynamically based on the detected signal characteristics and population of impulsive components. This dynamic approach ensures effective pop-noise removal while adapting to preserve speech components that may occur in similar frequency ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from signal-to-noise ratio estimation and impulsive component detection to control the pop-noise removal mask application. By continuously monitoring the error signal and reference signal characteristics, the system adjusts the masking parameters in real-time, applying stronger suppression when pop-noise is detected and reducing suppression when speech components are present, thereby maintaining speech quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If spectral processing is applied across the full frequency range, then all noise components are addressed, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive noise coverageVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the frequency spectrum into different processing zones. The low-frequency region below the predetermined upper frequency limit is processed with the specialized pop-noise removal mask, while higher frequency regions use conventional noise reduction processing. This segmentation reduces computational complexity by applying complex processing only where necessary (low frequencies where pop-noise occurs) rather than across the entire spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3428918B1Pop noise control
Publication Date: 2020.02.12 HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYST GMBH
  • EP3428918B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3428918B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3428918B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Example pop noise removal systems and methods include detecting impulsive components in an input signal based on a signal-to-noise ratio spectrum of the input signal, and generating a spectral pop noise removal mask and applying the spectral pop noise removal mask to the input signal if impulsive components in the input signal are detected, the pop noise removal mask configured to suppress the impulsive components in the input signal, when applied.