Porous Aluminum Battery Anode Structure for Low Capacity Decay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The capacity decay rate of aluminum batteries is affected by the aluminum dissolution reaction on the negative electrode, and existing designs fail to effectively improve this performance for scale-up production.

Innovation Solution

A negative electrode structure comprising a hole material layer with a high specific surface area and an aluminum metal plating layer electroplated using aluminum salt-based ionic liquid, which increases reaction sites and reduces capacity decay to less than 5% per cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the negative electrode structure is optimized to improve aluminum dissolution reaction rate, then the capacity decay rate decreases, but the electrode structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacity decay rateVSAvoidelectrode structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining a hole material layer (activated carbon, graphite, or carbon black) with an aluminum metal plating layer. This composite structure leverages the high surface area of hole materials and the reactive aluminum surface to synergistically improve aluminum dissolution reaction rate, reducing capacity decay rate to less than 5% per cycle while managing structural complexity through a two-layer design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes porous materials by employing hole material layers with high specific surface area (100-3000 m²/g) as the base structure. The porous/holey structure provides numerous reaction sites that enhance aluminum dissolution kinetics. When combined with the aluminum plating layer, this porous architecture significantly improves battery reliability without requiring complex multi-component structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Productivity

If the specific surface area of the hole material layer is increased to enhance reaction sites, then the aluminum dissolution reaction rate improves, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealuminum dissolution reaction rateVSAvoidspecific surface area control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by specifying a range for specific surface area (100-3000 m²/g) and weight ratio (2-100 mg/cm²) rather than requiring precise single-value control. This approach allows manufacturers to achieve improved aluminum dissolution reaction rates while accommodating variations in manufacturing processes. The electroplating method further enables controlled deposition within this range without demanding extreme precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses ionic liquid as an intermediary medium for electroplating the aluminum metal layer onto the hole material layer. This intermediary approach enables controlled aluminum deposition that achieves the desired weight range (2-100 mg/cm²) and surface area characteristics without requiring direct, high-precision control of the complex multi-parameter electrode structure, thus improving productivity while managing manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the weight of the metal plating layer is increased to improve reaction activity, then the capacity decay rate decreases, but the cost of materials increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacity decay rateVSAvoidmetal plating layer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by defining an optimal weight range for the aluminum metal plating layer (2-100 mg/cm²) rather than using excessive amounts. This controlled parameter approach ensures sufficient reaction activity to achieve capacity decay rate of less than 5% per cycle while avoiding unnecessary material consumption. The electroplating process enables precise control within this range, optimizing the balance between reliability improvement and material quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite electrode design enhances the performance of aluminum batteries by reducing capacity decay and facilitating scale-up production through increased reaction sites and efficient aluminum dissolution.

Implementation Method 1

the metal plating layer is electroplated on the hole material layer by ionic liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroplating: Electroplating

Implementation Method 2

the metal plating layer is electroplated on the hole material layer by ionic liquid. the ionic liquid includes aluminum salt-based ionic liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP4372846A1Negative electrode structure applied to an aluminum battery
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 APH EPOWER CO LTD
  • EP4372846A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4372846A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4372846A1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A negative electrode structure applied to an aluminum battery includes a hole material layer (111) and a metal plating layer (112). The metal plating layer (112) is located on the hole material layer (111) such that the capacity decay rate of the aluminum battery is less than 5% per cycle.