Porous Bone Substitute Material with Elastomer Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bone substitute materials fail to effectively combine osteoconduction and osteoinduction properties with controlled biodegradability, making them inadequate for restoring large bone defects and promoting complete bone regeneration.

Innovation Solution

A porous bone substitute material comprising a porous elastomer matrix and decellularized bone particles, which provides mechanical stability, biocompatibility, and controlled biodegradability, allowing for osteoprogenitor cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation into osteoblasts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional bone substitute materials (ceramics, hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphates) are used, then osteoconduction is provided, but osteoinduction and controlled biodegradability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone regeneration effectivenessVSAvoidcombination of osteoconduction, osteoinduction and biodegradability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines decellularized bone particles (providing osteoinduction through growth factors and osteoconduction through mineral matrix) with a porous elastomer matrix ( providing mechanical stability and controlled biodegradability). This composite structure integrates multiple functions that conventional single-material substitutes cannot achieve simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The material exhibits different properties in different phases: the decellularized bone particles provide biological activity (osteoinduction and osteoconduction) while the elastomer matrix provides mechanical support and controlled degradation. This spatial differentiation of functions resolves the contradiction between biological effectiveness and mechanical stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If autologous bone graft is used, then biological compatibility is achieved, but cell death in transplanted tissue and requirement for two surgical sites occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiological compatibilityVSAvoidcell death and surgical complications
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses decellularized bone particles as a biological copy that retains the essential osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties of natural bone without the harmful aspects. The decellularization process removes cells (avoiding cell death issues) while preserving the extracellular matrix and growth factors that drive bone regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The decellularized bone particles act as an intermediary between the patient's own bone regeneration capacity and the implant site. They provide the biological signals needed for osteogenesis without requiring harvesting from another site, thus eliminating the need for two surgical procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If allogeneic bone graft is used, then bone substance is replaced, but immune response and limited availability occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone material replacementVSAvoidimmune response
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The decellularization process converts what would be harmful cellular components (potential sources of immune rejection in allogeneic grafts) into benefits by removing them entirely. The resulting acellular matrix provides structural support and growth factor reservoirs without triggering immune responses, while still delivering osteoinductive signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Reliability

If porous structure is implemented, then vascularization and cell proliferation are promoted, but mechanical strength may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone regeneration supportVSAvoidmechanical integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The elastomer matrix provides a flexible, porous framework that maintains mechanical integrity while allowing vascular infiltration and cell migration. The elastomeric nature allows the material to accommodate structural requirements for strength while the porosity enables biological functions like vascularization and nutrient transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Data Source

PatentUS20240350708A1Porous bone substitution material
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 OST DEV CLERMONT FERRAND FR
  • US20240350708A1 patent drawing
  • US20240350708A1 patent drawing
  • US20240350708A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a porous bone substitution material for bone repair, in particular the repair of a cavitary bone defect and/or the repair of a segmental bone defect.