3D Porous Cell Separation Structure for Selective Affinity Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cell separation technologies face challenges in achieving large and controlled surface-volume ratios with optimized geometric and spatial properties for efficient cell purification, particularly in affinity-based methods.

Innovation Solution

The development of devices with non-random voids and solid geometrical structures made of biocompatible polymers, featuring precise and uniform void and pore diameters, along with surface coatings for cell binding, allowing for controlled cell capture and separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If non-random voids and solid geometrical structures with controlled dimensions are used, then cell separation efficiency is improved, but device manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoid and pore diameter uniformityVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device utilizes a porous structure with non-random voids and pore openings where 90% or more of voids have a selected volume and 90% or more of pore openings have a controlled diameter. This porous material approach enables controlled cell separation based on size exclusion while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized geometric patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention specifies precise parameter ranges including void volume variation of ±10.0% or less and pore diameter variation of ±10.0% or less. By controlling these dimensional parameters within defined tolerances, the device achieves consistent cell separation performance while enabling scalable manufacturing through parameter standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If large surface-volume ratio is achieved through optimized geometric structures, then cell binding capacity is improved, but device manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface area for cell separationVSAvoiddevice fabrication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs three-dimensional solid geometrical structures with non-random voids distributed throughout the volume, transitioning from two-dimensional surface patterns to three-dimensional spatial arrangements. This dimensional expansion increases the available surface area for cell binding while maintaining manufacturability through volumetric fabrication approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The structure incorporates hierarchical nesting where non-random voids contain non-random pore openings, creating multiple levels of geometric complexity within a unified framework. This nested arrangement maximizes surface area within a compact volume while enabling modular manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If affinity-based cell isolation is implemented with surface coatings, then cell capture specificity is improved, but non-specific binding increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell capture specificityVSAvoidnon-specific cell interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The surface coating is applied selectively to specific regions of the voids and solid geometrical structures where cell binding is desired. By localizing the affinity-based coating to specific surfaces rather than uniformly coating the entire device, the invention enhances target cell capture while minimizing non-specific binding on other device surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The devices achieve high efficiency in isolating targeted cells, with separation rates exceeding 50% to 100% of introduced cells, utilizing affinity-based techniques while minimizing non-specific interactions.

Implementation Method 1

affinity-based cell isolation techniques which rely upon binding interactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAffinity-based binding interactions: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS12539515B2Devices for cell separation
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 SOUTHWEST RES INST
  • US12539515B2 patent drawing
  • US12539515B2 patent drawing
  • US12539515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and methods suitable for cell separation. The devices herein include non-random voids interconnected through non-random pores and/or non-random solid geometrical structures optionally connected through solid non-random interconnecting elements. Such devices are preferably suitable for affinity-based cell isolation techniques which rely upon binding interactions.