Low Density Porous Iridium for Gamma Radiation Sources

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gamma radiation sources, particularly those using iridium, face challenges in manufacturing economies and performance, including high fabrication costs, focal dimension limitations, and image quality issues due to cylindrical geometry, as well as handling difficulties with radioactive powders.

Innovation Solution

The development of low-density porous iridium or its alloys and composites with spherical or quasi-spherical geometry, achieved through methods like sintering and gas centrifuge enrichment, which allows for reduced density, increased activation yield, and a softer emission spectrum, enabling improved image quality and reduced Iridium-192 source content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional dense iridium is used in cylindrical geometry, then manufacturing is straightforward, but output efficiency is limited and focal dimensions are large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput efficiencyVSAvoidfocal dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs porous iridium with controlled porosity (30-70% void volume) to reduce material density while maintaining structural integrity. This allows increased specific surface area for neutron activation, thereby improving output efficiency per unit volume and reducing focal dimensions compared to conventional dense iridium sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from cylindrical geometry to spherical or quasi-spherical geometry for the iridium source. This shape optimization improves image quality by eliminating the infinitely sharp tangential edges inherent in cylindrical sources, while the spherical form factor combined with porous structure achieves superior output efficiency and reduced focal dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Productivity

If porous iridium with 30-70% density is used, then activation yield and output efficiency increase, but material strength and structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation yieldVSAvoidmaterial strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes porous iridium structures with controlled porosity levels (30-70% void volume) that optimize the balance between activation yield and structural integrity. The porous architecture provides increased surface area for neutron activation while the iridium matrix maintains sufficient mechanical strength through its inherent high-strength properties and controlled pore distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite structures combining iridium with binding agents or matrix materials that provide structural support while allowing the porous iridium to maintain its optimized porosity for high activation yield. This composite approach ensures both mechanical integrity and enhanced neutron activation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If spherical geometry is implemented, then image quality improves, but manufacturing complexity increases compared to cylindrical stacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts spherical or quasi-spherical geometry for the iridium source to eliminate the infinitely sharp tangential edges characteristic of cylindrical sources, thereby improving image quality in radiographic applications. The spherical form factor provides superior geometric unsharpness characteristics while the manufacturing process uses specialized techniques to achieve the desired precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs porous iridium that can be formed into spherical shapes through controlled sintering or consolidation processes. This porous structure allows for easier shaping and reduced handling complexity compared to dense iridium, while maintaining the geometric precision required for high-quality imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Use of energy by moving object

If low-density porous iridium is used, then a softer emission spectrum is achieved, but total radiation output may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission spectrum qualityVSAvoidtotal radiation output
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes low-density porous iridium with 30-70% porosity to achieve a softer emission spectrum with more predominant lower energy emissions. This porous structure increases the specific surface area available for neutron activation, which compensates for the reduced material density and maintains adequate total radiation output while improving spectral quality for imaging applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the density parameter of iridium from conventional high density to controlled low density (30-70% of theoretical density). This parameter change fundamentally alters the emission spectrum characteristics, producing a softer spectrum with enhanced lower energy components that are more suitable for radiographic imaging, while the increased surface area compensates for reduced bulk density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in an 11-17% increase in Iridium-192 output efficiency, a 7-11% increase in activation yield, and an overall 18-28% efficiency gain, while reducing focal dimensions and improving image quality, without the image quality disadvantages of annular configurations.

Implementation Method 1

increased activation yield

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutron activation: Nuclear Fission

Implementation Method 2

achieved through methods like sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS11017911B2Low density porous iridium
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 QSA GLOBAL INC
  • US11017911B2 patent drawing
  • US11017911B2 patent drawing
  • US11017911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure pertains to a radiation source, such as an active insert, typically containing porous or microporous iridium or compounds, alloys or composites thereof within an encapsulation, and methods of manufacture thereof. The porosity or microporosity or low-density alloying ingredient with iridium causes a reduced density of the iridium within the active insert to be achieved.