Porous Membrane Gradient Structure for Virus Removal and Protein Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing virus removal membranes face challenges in achieving high permeation speed and efficient protein recovery while suppressing clogging and maintaining virus removability over time, particularly for small viruses like parvovirus.

Innovation Solution

A porous membrane with a hydrophobic polymer and water-insoluble hydrophilic polymer, featuring a dense layer and a gradient asymmetric structure where pore diameters increase from the downstream to the upstream portion, with a specific gradient index of 0.5 to 12.0, to enhance protein recovery and reduce clogging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a membrane with small pore diameter is used to remove small viruses like parvovirus, then virus removal safety is improved, but protein recovery efficiency deteriorates due to protein blocking the pores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevirus removal safetyVSAvoidprotein recovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is segmented into multiple functional layers with different pore sizes: a dense layer for virus removal and a porous support layer for structural stability. This allows the membrane to achieve both small virus removal capability and protein recovery efficiency by distributing different functions across different layers rather than relying on a single uniform pore size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the membrane have different pore diameters tailored to specific functions. The dense layer has small pores (20-50 nm) for virus removal, while the porous support layer has larger pores for structural integrity and protein passage. This local differentiation allows simultaneous optimization of virus removal safety and protein recovery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If a membrane with high permeation speed is used to improve productivity, then protein recovery efficiency is improved, but clogging occurs reducing sustained virus removability over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepermeation speedVSAvoidsustained virus removability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane structure is designed in advance with a dense layer positioned to intercept viruses before they reach the porous support layer. This preliminary action of virus capture in the dense layer prevents viruses from clogging the support layer during high-speed permeation, maintaining sustained virus removability while achieving high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The dense layer acts as an intermediary barrier between the feed solution and the porous support layer. It mediates the interaction by capturing viruses and preventing them from reaching the support layer, thereby enabling high permeation speeds without clogging that would compromise sustained virus removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the pore diameter is reduced to capture small viruses, then virus removal capability is improved, but the membrane becomes more susceptible to clogging by proteins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevirus removal capabilityVSAvoidclogging by proteins
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is divided into a dense layer with small pores for virus capture and a porous support layer with larger pores for structural stability and protein passage. This segmentation allows the dense layer to have small pores for virus removal capability while the support layer prevents protein clogging by providing an alternative pathway for proteins to pass through without blocking the critical virus-capture pores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The membrane combines a dense layer material optimized for virus capture with a porous support layer material optimized for structural integrity and anti-clogging properties. This composite structure integrates the advantages of both materials: the dense layer provides virus removal capability while the porous support layer resists protein clogging, achieving both objectives simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The membrane enables efficient protein recovery with reduced clogging and sustained virus removability by maintaining high flux over time, even at elevated pressures, effectively capturing small viruses like parvovirus.

Implementation Method 1

A membrane filtration method that is effective for all the viruses irrespective of their thermal and chemical characteristics has been received attention

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

a water-insoluble hydrophilic polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophilic interaction: Hydrophile

Data Source

PatentUS12364954B2Porous membrane
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 ASAHI KASEI LIFE SCIENCE CORPORATION
  • US12364954B2 patent drawing
  • US12364954B2 patent drawing
  • US12364954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A porous membrane containing a hydrophobic polymer and a water-insoluble hydrophilic polymer, the porous membrane having a dense layer in the downstream portion of filtration in the membrane, having a gradient asymmetric structure in which the average pore diameter of fine pores increases from the downstream portion of filtration toward the upstream portion of filtration, and having a gradient index of the average pore diameter from the dense layer to the coarse layer of 0.5 to 12.0.