Porous Monolith Sorbent Blocks for Low-Pressure-Drop CO2 Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing direct air capture (DAC) systems face high energy costs due to pressure drops, contamination of captured CO2 with air during desorption, and difficulties in sealing and replacing sorbent materials.

Innovation Solution

The use of porous monolith sorbent blocks with partial sealing and controlled desorption processes to minimize pressure drop and air contamination, allowing for efficient CO2 capture and easy sorbent replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If large quantities of air are pumped through DAC systems to capture CO2, then CO2 capture capacity is improved, but energy consumption increases due to pressure drop

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 capture capacityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the air stream into multiple parallel flows that pass through separate sorbent beds simultaneously, rather than forcing all air through a single bed. This segmentation reduces the pressure drop across each individual bed while maintaining overall CO2 capture capacity through the combined effect of multiple beds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-column sequential processing approach to a multi-column parallel processing arrangement. By adding the dimension of parallelism, the system achieves both high CO2 capture capacity and low pressure drop by distributing the air flow across multiple pathways

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If the cavity is fully sealed during desorption to prevent air contamination, then CO2 purity is improved, but the structural weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 purityVSAvoidstructural weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the sealing function from the main structural walls and implements it locally only at the gas inlet and outlet openings using lightweight door elements. This allows the majority of the cavity structure to remain open and lightweight while still achieving the necessary sealing for CO2 purity during desorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making the entire cavity structure heavy and sealed, the invention applies sealing properties locally only where needed (at the openings) using lightweight movable doors, while the rest of the structure remains lightweight and open

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If the cavity is fully sealed to prevent air contamination, then CO2 purity is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 purityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is extracted from the permanent structure and implemented as simple movable doors that can be opened and closed as needed. This reduces the inherent complexity of the structure while maintaining the ability to achieve high CO2 purity when sealing is required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic movable doors that can transition between open and closed states, allowing the system to adapt its sealing level to the operational requirements. This dynamic approach reduces overall device complexity compared to a permanently sealed structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If the cavity is fully sealed during desorption, then air contamination is reduced, but the difficulty of removing and replacing sorbent increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 purityVSAvoidsorbent replacement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sorbent bed is divided into multiple accessible sections or columns, each with its own inlet/outlet openings that can be independently sealed. This allows sorbent in one section to be replaced without affecting the sealing or operation of other sections, making maintenance easier while maintaining CO2 purity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves low-pressure drop and reduced air contamination in CO2 capture, with efficient CO2 purity and cost-effective operation through the use of monolith sorbent blocks and partial sealing techniques.

Implementation Method 1

passing the gaseous CO2-containing stream through a plurality of adjacent porous monolith sorbent blocks thereby adsorbing CO2 from the CO2-containing stream onto the monolith sorbent blocks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

desorbing the partly sealed monolith sorbent block by passing a stream of a desorption fluid through the partly sealed monolith sorbent block thereby releasing CO2 adsorbed to the partly sealed monolith sorbent block

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Data Source

PatentUS20250312726A1A process for capture of carbon dioxide
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 SHELL USA INC
  • US20250312726A1 patent drawing
  • US20250312726A1 patent drawing
  • US20250312726A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for capture of CO2 from a gaseous CO2-containing stream. The process comprises (a) providing stream; (b) passing the stream through a plurality of adjacent porous monolith sorbent blocks. Each block defines internal channels from a first side of block that can receive the stream to a second side from which a treated gaseous stream having a reduced CO2-concentration can exit. The method further comprises (c) removing treated stream; (d) sealing the first and second sides of a block upon reaching a pre-determined CO2 saturation level, to obtain a partly sealed block; (e) desorbing the partly sealed block using a desorption fluid to obtain a CO2-enriched stream and a partly sealed CO2-depleted block; (f) removing the stream; (g) unsealing the first and second sides; and (h) recommencing passing the stream through the unsealed CO2-depleted block.