Porous Silicon Core with Carbon Shell for Battery Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High capacity electrochemically active materials in batteries experience substantial volume changes during lithiation and delithiation, leading to mechanical stress, fractures, and capacity fading due to their inability to accommodate swelling without damaging the electrode structures and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers.

Innovation Solution

The development of electrode material composite structures comprising a porous base structure with high capacity active materials encapsulated in a shell that constrains the base during lithiation, allowing lithium ions to pass through while preventing electrolyte solvents from interacting with the active material, thereby maintaining structural integrity and cycling performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If high capacity active materials like silicon are used to replace graphite, then the theoretical capacity increases from 372 mAh/g to 4,200 mAh/g, but the volumetric changes during lithiation reach 400% causing mechanical fractures and capacity fading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelithiation capacityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by coating the high capacity active material particles with a flexible carbon shell that can accommodate volumetric changes during lithiation. The carbon shell acts as a constraint layer that prevents mechanical fracture while allowing the silicon to expand and contract, thus maintaining structural integrity during cycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining silicon (high capacity active material) with carbon (constraining shell). This composite approach allows the silicon to provide high capacity while the carbon shell provides mechanical strength and structural stability, resolving the contradiction between capacity and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Use of energy by moving object

If high capacity active materials are used, then the energy density increases, but the cycle life deteriorates due to pulverization of electrode structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidcycle life
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The carbon shell coating provides a flexible constraint that allows the active material to undergo volumetric changes during cycling without pulverizing. This maintains electrode structure integrity over many cycles, thereby improving cycle life while preserving the high energy density of the silicon-based active material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The carbon shell is applied beforehand to the silicon particles, creating a protective cushion that absorbs mechanical stress during lithiation and delithiation. This pre-applied constraint prevents damage accumulation that would otherwise lead to capacity fading and shortens cycle life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Strength

If the active material is constrained in a shell, then the mechanical stress is reduced, but the device complexity increases due to the composite structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carbon shell provides mechanical constraint to reduce stress on the active material, while the simplicity of the coating approach (compared to complex multi-layer structures) keeps the overall device complexity manageable. The shell is thin and conformal, adding minimal complexity while providing substantial mechanical benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively accommodates the volume changes of high capacity active materials, reducing mechanical stress and capacity fading, and maintaining the structural integrity of the electrodes, thus enhancing the cycling characteristics and integration of these materials into various battery types.

Implementation Method 1

The shell allows lithium ions to pass through but prevents electrolyte solvents from interacting with the encapsulated active material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon transport: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

The porosity of the porous base structure decreases during lithiation of the high capacity active material and increases during delithiation of the high capacity active material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity change: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS9698410B2Composite structures containing high capacity porous active materials constrained in shells
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 AMPRIUS TECH INC
  • US9698410B2 patent drawing
  • US9698410B2 patent drawing
  • US9698410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are novel electrode material composite structures containing high capacity active materials formed into porous base structures. The structures also include shells that encapsulate these porous base structures. During lithiation of the active material, the shell mechanically constrains the porous base structure. The shell allows lithium ions to pass through but prevents electrolyte solvents from interacting with the encapsulated active material. In certain embodiments, the shell contains carbon, while the porous base structure contains silicon. Although silicon tends to swell during lithiation, the porosity of the base structure and/or void spaces inside the shell helps to accommodate this additional volume within the shell without breaking it or substantially increasing the overall size of the composite structure. This allows integration of the composite structures into various types of battery electrodes and cycling high capacity active materials without damaging the electrodes' internal structures and deteriorating cycling characteristics of batteries.