Portable Bird Feeder Telescoping Support and Sealed Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a lightweight and portable bird feeding device that can be easily transitioned between stationary and portable modes, allowing for close-range observation of birds, including hummingbirds, and must be compact and easy to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A bird feeding device comprising a food storage container with a telescoping support member that attaches to a user, allowing selective positioning and featuring a funnel-shaped nozzle or apertures for animal access, which can be used as both a stand-alone and portable device, with a sealed or sealable design for transport without spilling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a portable bird feeder is designed to be lightweight and compact, then portability and ease of transport are improved, but the device may lack stability or sufficient feeding functionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of bird feederVSAvoidstability of feeding device
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bird feeder is divided into separate components: a removable feeding container, a telescoping support rod, and a base. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently - the container can be lightweight for portability while the base provides stability when assembled, resolving the contradiction between light weight and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The telescoping support rod provides adjustable length, allowing the feeder to adapt to different usage scenarios. When extended, it provides sufficient height for stable feeding; when retracted, it reduces overall size for compact storage and transport, dynamically balancing stability and portability requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a funnel-shaped nozzle is provided for animal access, then feeding functionality is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding accessibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The complex funnel-shaped nozzle is extracted and replaced with simple apertures directly in the container wall. This extraction eliminates the need for complex nozzle manufacturing while maintaining feeding functionality, as birds can access food through the simple holes without requiring a funnel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of providing a funnel that protrudes outward to guide birds, the design inverts the approach by creating apertures that birds access directly from the outside. This reversal simplifies the structure from a complex three-dimensional nozzle to simple two-dimensional openings in the container wall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the feeder is designed as a sealed device for transport, then portability is improved, but animal access to food becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport capabilityVSAvoidanimal access to food
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The feeder separates the sealing function (cap on container) from the feeding function (apertures in container wall). The cap can be sealed during transport to prevent spills, while the apertures remain as simple openings that birds can access when the feeder is in use, resolving the contradiction between sealed transport and animal access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If a telescoping support member is added for selective positioning, then positioning flexibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning flexibilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The telescoping support rod provides dynamic adjustability in length, allowing the feeder to be positioned at various heights and distances from the user. This single dynamic component achieves positioning flexibility without requiring multiple complex mechanisms, mechanisms, or joints, keeping the overall device complexity manageable while providing versatile positioning options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10687517B2Portable bird feeder
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 TRIBBLE CHAD
  • US10687517B2 patent drawing
  • US10687517B2 patent drawing
  • US10687517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bird feeding device is provided. The device comprises the ability to house food for attracting and feeding birds and other animals. The device is further capable of being provided in various modes of operation including a stationary mode of operation and a portable mode of operation. The portable mode comprises a support or attachment member for connecting the feeding device to a user, and wherein the bird feeding device is conveyed along with a user and operable to attract birds to the user even when the user is mobile.