Portable Golf Mat with Staggered Layer Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Artificial turf practice mats fail to accurately simulate golf shots hit off natural turf, leading to increased shock and false feedback for golfers, and existing solutions do not adequately reduce force or provide accurate divot simulation.

Innovation Solution

A golf practice mat design featuring a shorter upper mat placed on top of a longer lower mat, secured by an elastic connector, creating space for the club to pass through without hitting the mat, and an anchoring connector to prevent movement during shots, mimicking the divot experience of natural turf.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If artificial turf is used for practice mats, then maintenance difficulty and cost are reduced, but shock transmission to the golfer increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance easeVSAvoidshock transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The practice mat is divided into multiple layers: an upper artificial turf layer, a lower artificial turf layer, and an intermediate suspension system. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function - the upper layer provides a maintenance-free surface, the suspension system absorbs shock, and the lower layer provides structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A suspension system consisting of elastic straps or netting is introduced as an intermediary between the upper and lower turf layers. This intermediary component absorbs and dampens the shock generated when the club strikes the upper layer, preventing direct transmission to the golfer while maintaining the artificial turf's maintenance advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If artificial turf is used for practice mats, then divot maintenance is eliminated, but feedback accuracy on fat hits deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance easeVSAvoidfeedback accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system provides tactile feedback to the golfer that simulates natural turf conditions. When the club strikes the upper layer, the elastic suspension elements compress and rebound, creating a sensation similar to hitting natural grass, thereby providing accurate feedback on swing quality and contact point without requiring actual divots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system with elastic straps or netting creates a mechanical copy of natural turf's divot-making behavior. The way the suspension elements deform and rebound mimics the sensation of taking a divot from natural grass, providing authentic feedback without the maintenance requirements of real turf.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Object-affected harmful factors

If suspension systems are added to artificial turf mats, then shock reduction is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock transmissionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system utilizes flexible elastic straps or netting rather than rigid mechanical components. These flexible elements naturally absorb shock through elastic deformation, providing the required shock reduction function with minimal structural complexity and using simple, readily available materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Object-affected harmful factors

If club can pass through space without hitting mat, then shock is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock transmissionVSAvoidmat length precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention specifies that the upper mat length should be approximately 2/3 of the lower mat length, creating a gap of about 1-2 inches. This parameter relationship provides sufficient space for the club to pass through without striking the lower mat, reducing shock while allowing for reasonable manufacturing tolerances rather than requiring precise dimensional control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly reduces shock and provides accurate feedback on mis-hits, simulating natural turf conditions while being compact, lightweight, and easy to manufacture and maintain.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic connector that secures the upper mat on top of the lower mat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an anchoring connector to prevent movement during shots

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9999824B2Portable golf mat
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 BROSSEAU JR DONALD OSWALD
  • US9999824B2 patent drawing
  • US9999824B2 patent drawing
  • US9999824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mat for practicing golf shots, including an upper mat and a lower mat. The lower mat is larger than the upper mat. The upper mat is secured on top of the lower mat such that the additional area of the lower mat extends in the direction of the anticipated trajectory of a golf club head. A golf ball is placed on the edge of the upper mat such that the club head will travel through the empty space above the lower mat and in front of the lower mat. As a result, the golfer experiences less force due to the club head striking the mat.