Portable Pressure Testing Module for Pipeline Field Sites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for pressure testing of pressurized fluid-containing vessels in field conditions are prone to operator errors due to manual operations and lack of integration among individual components, which can compromise test results and safety.

Innovation Solution

A portable pressure testing system with a housing containing a supply port, conduit, valve, pressure sensor, flow meter, and processor that automates the pressure operation, records data, and outputs a report, enabling remote operation and reducing operator intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual operations are used for pressure testing, then operators can directly control the testing process, but operator errors increase and test reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest reliabilityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation where the automated control unit independently manages the pressure testing process based on pre-programmed protocols. The control unit automatically operates valves, monitors sensors, and records data without requiring continuous manual intervention, thereby eliminating operator errors while maintaining full control over the testing procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with an automated electronic control system. The automated control unit uses electronic signals to operate pneumatic or electric valves, replace manual gauge readings with electronic pressure and temperature sensors, and substitute manual data recording with automated digital data acquisition and processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If individual components are used for pressure testing, then device complexity is reduced, but component integration and communication fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent integrationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent testing components into a single integrated automated pressure testing system. The control unit consolidates valve control, sensor data acquisition, data processing, and result generation into one unified system. This integration ensures reliable communication between components through standardized interfaces and protocols, eliminating the communication failures that occur with separate independent components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control unit serves multiple functions within a single device: it controls valve operations, monitors pressure and temperature sensors, processes test data, generates reports, and manages the overall testing sequence. This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple separate components while maintaining reliable integrated operation through a universal control platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If operators are required onsite for manual operations, then direct control is possible, but safety hazards increase due to operator exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidoperation accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pressure testing operations autonomously without requiring operators to be physically present onsite during the testing process. The automated control unit independently executes test sequences, monitors system parameters, and manages safety protocols, thereby eliminating operator exposure to potential hazards while maintaining full operational control through remote or automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If manual data compilation is performed, then flexibility in handling test results is maintained, but time consumption and error potential increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual data compilation and analysis with automated electronic data processing. Sensors continuously acquire test data during the pressure testing process, and the automated control unit immediately processes this data according to pre-programmed algorithms. Results are automatically generated and reported, eliminating the time-consuming manual data transcription, calculation, and analysis processes while reducing errors associated with manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12292357B2Pressure testing of equipment
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 ION PRO SERVICES LLC
  • US12292357B2 patent drawing
  • US12292357B2 patent drawing
  • US12292357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method enable pressure testing a specimen with a portable module for deployment to a field site of the specimen, such as a pipeline. The module includes a processor capable of controlling various devices, such as valves and pumps, and recording sensed data from multiple sources, such as pressure/temperature/flow sensors, cameras and weather feed. The processor may receive input operation specifications for execution to perform the testing with limited human interaction through pressurization, hold and depressurization phases of the testing. The module includes safety features that may avoid over pressurization, require operator identifiers or initiate interlock protocols upon the processor detecting an anomaly. The processor then outputs notifications and reports of desired parameters from the test.