Portable Saddle Stand Mounting Structure for Stable, Secure Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing saddle stands are cumbersome, heavy, and stationary, unable to support the weight of both saddles and riders, and often fail to securely attach to various surfaces, leading to issues like expensive saddles falling off tack rails.

Innovation Solution

A portable saddle stand apparatus that securely attaches to tack rails, fencing, stall doors, or horizontal surfaces, featuring a saddle supporting structure with front and rear mounts, strap fasteners, and integrated storage compartments, designed to be sturdy enough for riders and equipped with accessory hooks and drainage for outdoor use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional saddle stands are designed with heavy materials and stationary structures to provide stability and support, then the strength and stability are improved, but the portability and ease of relocation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport strengthVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The saddle stand transitions from a stationary structure to a movable one through the use of a wheeled base. The base includes a platform with wheels that allow the entire saddle stand assembly to be easily relocated while maintaining structural integrity and support capacity when positioned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The saddle stand is divided into separable components: a saddle support structure, a base platform, and wheels. This segmentation allows the heavy-duty support structure to remain strong while the base provides mobility, resolving the contradiction between strength and portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If saddle stands are designed as stationary structures with fixed positions to ensure stability, then the stability is improved, but the adaptability to different locations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidlocation adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The saddle stand base incorporates wheels that enable the structure to be dynamically repositioned to various locations around the stable or tack room. Once positioned, the structure provides stable support, thus achieving both adaptability and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The saddle stand is designed to be universally applicable in multiple locations within equestrian facilities. The wheeled base allows it to serve different functions in different areas - whether for saddle storage, fitting work, or rider mounting - enhancing its versatility while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If portable saddle stands are designed with lightweight and compact structures to improve portability, then the ease of relocation is improved, but the strength to support rider weight deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidload bearing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mobility is achieved through wheeled movement rather than reducing structural mass. The saddle support structure itself remains robust and heavy-duty to bear rider weight, while the mobility function is separated to the wheel assembly, allowing both portability and strength to coexist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system separates the mobility function (wheels and base platform) from the load-bearing function (saddle support structure). This segmentation allows the support structure to be optimized for strength while the base optimizes for mobility, resolving the contradiction between portability and load capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If saddle stands are designed without attachment mechanisms to simplify structure, then the device complexity is reduced, but the security of saddle attachment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidsaddle security
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment mechanism is integrated into the base platform structure rather than being a separate complex assembly. The base includes built-in features for securing saddles, combining the support and attachment functions into a unified simple structure that provides reliable saddle security without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9493336B2Portable saddle stand apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.11.15 SCANLON SHANE DARNELL
  • US9493336B2 patent drawing
  • US9493336B2 patent drawing
  • US9493336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable saddle stand apparatus that can be secured to an existing structure allows a saddle to be securely placed upon the saddle stand apparatus when the respective saddle is not fastened to an animals back by a girth. The saddle stand apparatus includes a saddle supporting structure, a front mount, a rear mount, a front strap fastener, and a rear strap fastener. The front mount attaches with a front mount receiving bracket of the saddle supporting structure, and the rear mount attaches with a rear mount receiving bracket of the saddle supporting structure. The front strap fastener secures the front mount to the saddle supporting structure while securing a front end of the saddle stand apparatus to the existing structure. Similarly, the rear strap fastener secures the rear mount to the saddle supporting structure while securing a rear end of the saddle stand apparatus to the existing structure.