Modular Portable Storage Container Latch With Spring Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cargo compartment systems require multiple user interactions for loading and unloading, lack scalability, and are not easily portable across various applications, including private, industrial, and warehouse settings, with high manufacturing complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

A modular portable storage container system with a latch mechanism using a spring latch, latch receiver, and retaining hook, allowing container sections to be securely attached to infrastructure substrates via mounting points, and featuring a slide lock mechanism for enhanced stability and versatility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional cargo compartment system is used, then the cargo can be stored and transported, but multiple user interactions are required for loading and unloading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction during loading and unloadingVSAvoidloading and unloading efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is pre-configured with a spring-loaded arm and detent that automatically engages when the container section is placed against the infrastructure substrate. This preliminary arrangement eliminates the need for multiple manual interactions during loading and unloading operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring latch mechanism automatically latches the container section to the infrastructure substrate without requiring continuous user intervention. The spring-loaded arm self-actuates to engage and disengage the detent, providing self-service functionality that improves operational ease and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If a scalable storage system is designed, then the system can be adapted to various applications, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability across various applicationsVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is divided into modular container sections that can be independently manufactured and assembled. Each section includes standardized mounting points and latch mechanisms, allowing the system to be scaled across different applications without increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism and mounting points are designed with universal compatibility, allowing the same components to be used across different container section sizes and application types. This universality enables scalability while maintaining low manufacturing complexity through standardized production processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a secure latch mechanism is implemented, then the container sections are retained against the infrastructure substrate, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention securityVSAvoidlatch mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is extracted as a separate, self-contained assembly that can be independently manufactured and installed. This extraction allows for simplified production and maintenance while maintaining secure retention functionality through the spring-loaded arm and detent design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism incorporates a dynamic spring-loaded arm that can automatically engage and disengage the detent based on the container section's position relative to the infrastructure substrate. This dynamic behavior provides reliable retention security while keeping the overall device complexity low through mechanical automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces user interaction during transit, provides scalable and portable storage, and is cost-effective with low complexity, suitable for diverse applications including vehicles, buildings, and shipping containers.

Implementation Method 1

a spring latch, a latch receiver, and a retaining hook. One of the spring latch and the latch receiver is disposed on mounting points disposed either directly or indirectly on the infrastructure substrate while the other of the spring latch and the latch receiver is disposed on the structural frames of each of the first container section and/or the second container section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12421021B2Modular portable storage container system
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 QT-SYST LLC
  • US12421021B2 patent drawing
  • US12421021B2 patent drawing
  • US12421021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular portable storage container system includes container sections, each having a frame. A latch mechanism retains the frames against an infrastructure substrate. The latch mechanism has: a spring latch, latch receiver, and retaining hook. The container sections are movable between unlatched and latched positions. When unlatched, the container sections are movable relative to the substrate and when latched the frames of the container sections are retained in contact with mounting points of the substrate via the latch mechanism. The spring latch and the latch engage one another when the container sections are in the latched position, and the retaining hook engages with the frame to rotatably retain the frame. The spring latch and retaining hook include mounting flanges that are selectively slidably and fixedly mountable to mounting points of the infrastructure substrate in one or more positions defined by a size of the container sections.