Portable Zip Line Tower Segmentation Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional zip line systems with permanent support structures are not easily transportable, making them costly and limiting in terms of venue flexibility, as they require significant labor and equipment for disassembly and cannot be set up in locations like outdoor events or areas with zoning restrictions.

Innovation Solution

A portable zip line tower system with a configurable structure that can be transported in a compact form and easily assembled, featuring a tower structure with multiple walls and platforms, and selectively openable barriers, allowing it to stand freely without fixed ground support, enabling setup in various locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fixed zip line towers are permanently fixed in the ground, then stability and structural strength are improved, but ease of transportation and venue flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidvenue flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tower structure is divided into multiple detachable sections that can be assembled and disassembled. The tower includes a base section, intermediate sections, and a top section that can be connected through coupling mechanisms, allowing the structure to be transported in parts and reassembled at different venues while maintaining structural integrity when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tower structure transitions from a static permanent installation to a dynamic reusable system. The modular design with quick-connect coupling mechanisms enables rapid assembly and disassembly, allowing the same structure to be dynamically relocated between venues while providing stable operation during each deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If traditional fixed zip line towers are permanently fixed in the ground, then structural strength is improved, but ease of manufacture and cost-effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetower structural strengthVSAvoidcost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tower is manufactured as separate modular sections that can be produced using standard fabrication processes. Each section can be manufactured independently and then assembled on-site using coupling mechanisms, reducing the need for expensive custom permanent installations and allowing for more cost-effective manufacturing and deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular tower sections are designed with universal coupling mechanisms that can be used across multiple towers and venues. This standardization allows the same manufactured components to serve multiple functions and locations, improving cost-effectiveness by eliminating the need for custom-built permanent structures at each venue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional fixed zip line towers require permanent ground fixation, then stability is improved, but device complexity for disassembly and transportation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground stabilityVSAvoiddisassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tower base includes a footprint section with ground engagement features that provide stability when assembled, but the entire structure can be disassembled into transportable sections. The coupling mechanisms allow for relatively simple connection and disconnection procedures compared to permanent concrete foundations, reducing disassembly complexity while maintaining operational stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If traditional fixed zip line towers are permanently installed, then structural stability is improved, but adaptability to different venues deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidvenue adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tower structure is designed as a reusable dynamic system that can be deployed at multiple venues rather than a static permanent installation. The modular sections with coupling mechanisms enable the same stable structure to be adaptively relocated to different venues including outdoor events, sporting events, and areas with zoning restrictions, greatly enhancing venue adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9814989B2Portable zip line system
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 EXPERIENCE BASED LEARNING
  • US9814989B2 patent drawing
  • US9814989B2 patent drawing
  • US9814989B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable zip line tower is provided. The portable zip line tower comprises a tower structure having a major longitudinal axis. The tower structure is configurable into a first configuration wherein the major longitudinal axis is generally parallel to ground and a second configuration wherein the major longitudinal axis is generally perpendicular to ground. At least one platform mounted at least partially within an interior space of the tower structure and the tower structure is configured for mobile transportation in the first configuration.