Portal Drive Layout for Balanced Sheet Cutting Machine Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic cutting machines for sheet materials face issues with asymmetrical traction force distribution, complex transmission systems, and difficulty in reconfiguration due to intricate connections between the portal and the rest of the structure, leading to cost-effectiveness and simplicity concerns.

Innovation Solution

The cutting machine employs two mirroring driving motors directly on the portal, eliminating the need for elaborate transmission systems and allowing for functional autonomy by combining actuations, enabling rapid reconfiguration and easy addition or replacement of components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single chain or belt transmission is used to drive the portal, then the structure is simpler, but the traction force is applied asymmetrically causing operational problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission system complexityVSAvoidportal operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single transmission system is segmented into two independent drive units, each with its own motor, positioned symmetrically on opposite sides of the portal. This segmentation allows balanced force distribution while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies symmetry rather than asymmetry - by positioning two identical drive units symmetrically on opposite sides of the portal, the asymmetric force application problem is resolved. Each upright becomes a mirror image of the other, ensuring balanced traction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If sophisticated transmission systems are used to distribute force to both uprights, then portal operation reliability improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportal operation reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force distribution problem is solved by segmenting the drive system into two independent units rather than using a complex single system. Each unit independently drives one upright, simplifying the overall transmission architecture while ensuring reliable force distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two symmetric drive units are merged into a coordinated system that operates as a unified portal drive. This combining approach achieves reliable force distribution without requiring elaborate transmission mechanisms between the uprights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the portal is intimately connected with the rest of the machine structure, then structural stability is improved, but reconfigurability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine structure stabilityVSAvoidmachine reconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is segmented into independent functional modules: the bed, the portal assembly, and the cutting head. The portal with its drive units can be independently positioned, removed, or reconfigured without affecting the core bed structure, enabling flexible adaptation while maintaining overall stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The portal assembly is designed with dynamic positioning capability along the bed, allowing it to be moved to different locations as needed. This dynamic reconfigurability is achieved through the symmetric drive units that can independently position the portal without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If multiple electrical connections are made between the portal and control devices, then actuation control is improved, but wiring complexity and reconfiguration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation controlVSAvoidwiring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple electrical connections are merged into integrated wiring harnesses that are routed through the symmetric structure of the portal. The control systems for both drive units and the cutting head are combined into a coordinated control architecture, reducing wiring complexity while maintaining full actuation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies the machine's structure, reduces costs, and enhances reconfigurability, allowing for efficient and flexible operation with reduced complexity in the transmission and wiring systems.

Implementation Method 1

Under the cutting plane suction means are arranged that, since the lower containment sheet is perforated, keep the lay in position during the cutting operations.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentEP2527104B1Automatic cutting machine for sheet material
Publication Date: 2014.01.08 OROX
  • EP2527104B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2527104B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2527104B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Automatic cutting machine (1) for sheet material, which is particularly versatile and efficient comprising: a fixed frame (10) that has a cutting plane (11); at least one portal (2) arranged astride of the cutting plane (11) and longitudinally mobile along it, said portal (2) comprising two side uprights (20) connected at the top by a cross-member (21) and a cutting head (3) that is mobile along said cross-member (21) so as to be able to operate on the cutting plane (11) below; motor means arranged to translate said portal (2) longitudinally with respect to said fixed frame (10) comprising two driving motors (4) of the portal (2), arranged on-board said portal (2), each of said driving motors (4) being arranged at a respective side upright (20).