Portal Intake Flow Generation for Adaptive Issue Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing issue tracking systems require tedious and inefficient processes for creating new interfaces and adapting to various user problems, leading to wasted computing resources and underutilization.

Innovation Solution

A system and interface that allows users to generate custom portal intake flows by selecting intake request types and workflows, with dynamic previews and configurations, and utilizes a generative output model for creating project management interfaces and generating summaries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a common interface is used for a wide variety of use cases, then system simplicity is maintained, but efficiency decreases and computing resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface adaptabilityVSAvoidissue creation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface dynamically adapts its structure and content based on the selected issue type and user role. The system transforms from a static common interface to a dynamic customized interface that displays only relevant fields and options, resolving the contradiction between maintaining a simple common interface and providing efficient specialized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the interface are customized according to local needs - each issue type receives a tailored interface with specific fields, options, and workflows relevant to that category. This allows the system to maintain a unified overall structure while providing specialized local experiences for different use cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If new processes or interfaces are specially adapted for specific issue types, then efficiency for those specific cases improves, but the process becomes tedious and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue creation efficiencyVSAvoidinterface configuration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration by pre-defining issue types, associated fields, and workflows. When a user selects an issue type, the interface is automatically configured based on these pre-established parameters, eliminating the need for users to manually configure each interface from scratch and significantly reducing setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates customized interfaces by copying and instantiating templates associated with each issue type. Instead of requiring users to build interfaces manually, the system automatically generates appropriate interface configurations by replicating pre-designed templates, dramatically reducing the time and effort required for interface creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional issue tracking systems are used, then system stability is maintained, but system utilization is underutilized and resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidsystem utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The issue tracking system is transformed into a multi-functional platform that can handle diverse issue types (software bugs, hardware failures, service requests, etc.) through a unified interface framework. This allows the system to maintain stability while significantly increasing utilization by accommodating various organizational needs within a single platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its functionality based on the selected issue type and organizational requirements. By implementing dynamic interface generation and configurable workflows, the system maintains its core stable architecture while providing flexible adaptability to different use cases, thereby increasing overall system utilization without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12536505B2Generative content creation for a portal intake flow for an issue tracking system
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 ATLASSIAN PTY LTD
  • US12536505B2 patent drawing
  • US12536505B2 patent drawing
  • US12536505B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for defining and creating a request intake flow for an issue tracking system is described. Embodiments described herein include systems and techniques for creating custom portal intake flows for an issue tracking system. The systems may include a user interface that allows portal intake flows to be generated and the user to select the information and workflow for an intake flow during the generation process. Embodiments are also directed to system and methods for creating dynamic summaries for issues managed by an issue tracking system. The dynamic summaries may be generated using a generative output model, as described herein, and provide information to a user about a current status, history or other events associated with an issue. Embodiments are directed to systems and methods for using a generative output engine to provide suggestions for creating a project management interface for an issue tracking system.