Digital Portrait Cover Image Selection via Face Vector Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional digital image systems are inaccurate, inefficient, and inflexible in selecting cover photos for users, often choosing non-representative images based on aesthetic appeal and requiring manual user interaction, leading to outdated selections.

Innovation Solution

A digital portrait selection system that uses a combination of representativeness and recency scores, along with face area and expandability scores, to dynamically select a cover image from a collection of digital portraits, ensuring the image is both representative and current.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If conventional systems select cover photos based on aesthetic appeal, then visual attractiveness is improved, but representativeness and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual attractivenessVSAvoidrepresentativeness accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the selection parameters from aesthetic appeal to a composite score incorporating representativeness (distance to mean face vector), recency (capture date), and face area ratio. This parameter transformation enables objective measurement of representativeness while maintaining visual quality through the weighted combination of factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces subjective aesthetic judgment with an automated computational mechanism that calculates representativeness scores based on face feature vectors and statistical analysis of the image collection, eliminating manual selection and its associated subjectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual user interaction is required for cover photo selection, then user control is improved, but efficiency and time consumption worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidselection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing the digital image collection, computing representativeness and recency scores for all portraits, and selecting the optimal cover photo without requiring user intervention. The automated selection process maintains user control through transparent scoring criteria while dramatically improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the entire image collection beforehand, pre-computing representativeness and recency scores for all candidate portraits. This preliminary action enables rapid selection without requiring users to manually review individual images during the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If static cover photo selection is used, then simplicity is improved, but flexibility and up-to-date accuracy worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection system simplicityVSAvoidflexibility to update
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamics by making the cover photo selection criteria time-sensitive through the recency factor. The automated system can dynamically update cover photo selections based on new images added to the collection, maintaining simplicity through algorithmic automation while achieving flexibility through temporal adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where newly added images are automatically evaluated against the existing collection, and the cover photo selection is updated if the new image provides improved representativeness or recency. This feedback loop enables continuous optimization without complicating the user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If representativeness and recency factors are combined, then selection accuracy is improved, but computational complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover photo selection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the selection process into independent computational steps: face detection, face vector generation, mean vector calculation, distance computation for representativeness, recency scoring based on capture dates, and weighted combination for final selection. This segmentation reduces overall complexity by breaking down the multi-factor evaluation into manageable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages computational complexity by transforming the multi-dimensional selection problem into a weighted sum of standardized parameters (representativeness score, recency score, face area ratio). This parameter transformation simplifies the combination logic while maintaining selection accuracy through the structured aggregation of independent scores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10990807B2Selecting representative recent digital portraits as cover images
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 ADOBE INC
  • US10990807B2 patent drawing
  • US10990807B2 patent drawing
  • US10990807B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems, methods, and non-transitory computer readable media for selecting representative recent cover images from collections of digital portraits by determining selection scores based on average face vectors. For example, the disclosed systems can generate an average face feature vector to represent a common appearance or facial expression of a user in the collection of digital portraits. The disclosed systems can further determine representativeness scores that indicate measures of closeness of digital portraits to the average face feature vectors. In addition, the digital portrait selection system can determine various other factors, such as recency scores, face area scores, and face expandability scores. Based on these factors, the digital portrait selection system can determine an overall selection score and select a digital portrait as a cover image.