Self-Service POS Fraud Detection Using Action and Input Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Full self-service POS terminals in retail stores are vulnerable to fraudulent activities by customers, necessitating the development of techniques to prevent such acts.

Innovation Solution

A monitoring apparatus equipped with a camera interface, terminal interface, and communication interface, which uses a processor to recognize customer actions and input operations, detect fraudulent acts, and output fraud detection images to the POS terminal and attendant terminal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If full self-service POS terminal is implemented, then personnel expenses are reduced and infection control is improved, but fraudulent behavior by customers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonnel expensesVSAvoidfraudulent behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a monitoring apparatus as an intermediary between the customer and the POS terminal. This apparatus includes a camera that captures images of the customer's actions and a processor that analyzes these images to detect fraudulent behavior. The monitoring apparatus acts as a mediator that enables full self-service while providing security oversight, thus resolving the contradiction between reducing personnel expenses and preventing fraud.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human staff monitoring with an automated image recognition system. The processor analyzes captured images using pattern recognition algorithms to detect suspicious actions such as not scanning items, swapping items, or attempting to steal. This substitution eliminates the need for additional personnel while maintaining fraud detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If monitoring apparatus is added to detect fraud, then fraudulent acts are detected, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring apparatus is designed to perform multiple functions using a single integrated system. The camera captures images for both security monitoring and operational analysis, the processor performs both image analysis and fraud detection, and the system communicates with the POS terminal to provide comprehensive monitoring. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized devices, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while maintaining high reliability for fraud detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260065282A1Monitoring apparatus, settlement apparatus, and programs
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US20260065282A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065282A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065282A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A monitoring apparatus includes a camera interface, a terminal interface, a communication interface, and a processor. The processor is configured to recognize actions of a settler at a point-of-sale terminal based on images from a camera, recognize input operations performed at the point-of-sale terminal by the settler based on information from the point-of-sale terminal and detect fraudulent acts based on a recognized action and a recognized input operation at the point-of-sale terminal. The processor outputs a fraud detection image corresponding to a detected fraudulent act to at least one of the point-of-sale terminal and an attendant terminal.