Point of Sale Product Identifier Validation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retailers incur significant revenue losses due to customers switching product identifiers, such as barcode labels, to obtain expensive items at a lower price, exploiting advancements in home printer technology and software to create counterfeit labels that can be scanned and read by point-of-sale systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that validate the authenticity of product identifiers like UPC, EAN, JAN, and RFID codes in real-time during transactions by comparing entered identifiers against a database of suspect or counterfeit items, allowing transactions only if they match records, and denying them if discrepancies are found, with optional multiple validation layers for higher-priced items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If barcode labels are made easier to reproduce and switch, then ease of operation improves, but loss of substance worsens due to fraudulent transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of barcode switchingVSAvoidrevenue loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by checking the barcode against a database of known counterfeit codes before completing the transaction. This preemptive measure identifies fraudulent attempts before they can result in revenue loss, while still allowing legitimate transactions to proceed smoothly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A validation system acts as an intermediary between the barcode scanner and the point-of-sale transaction. This intermediary layer verifies the authenticity of the barcode by comparing it against a database of suspect codes, blocking fraudulent transactions while permitting legitimate ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If barcode validation is implemented, then reliability improves by preventing fraud, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction authenticityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is designed to work with multiple types of product identifiers including UPC, EAN, JAN, and RFID codes through a single unified interface. The system performs the same validation logic across different identifier types, reducing the need for separate validation mechanisms for each code type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a database of copied or replicated counterfeit barcode codes to identify fraud. By maintaining a repository of known suspect codes, the system can quickly compare incoming barcodes against this reference data to detect switching attempts without requiring complex analysis of each individual code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If multiple validation layers are applied to high-value items, then reliability improves, but productivity worsens due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of validation intensity based on the specific characteristics of each transaction. High-value items or those with suspicious barcodes receive more stringent multi-layer validation, while standard low-risk transactions proceed through a streamlined validation process, optimizing both security and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system dynamically adjusts its checking parameters based on the transaction context. For high-value items, the system activates additional validation layers including multiple database queries and cross-referencing. For standard transactions, a single quick check suffices, maintaining fast processing speeds while providing enhanced security when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7455230B2UPC, EAN and JAN validation system and method for loss prevention at point of sale/return
Publication Date: 2008.11.25 E2INTERACTIVE INC
  • US7455230B2 patent drawing
  • US7455230B2 patent drawing
  • US7455230B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a process/system that validates the authenticity of the product UPC, EAN, JAN, RFID, EPC and/or equivalent code, in real-time, while a transaction is taking place. A database is preferably maintained including a list of suspected false or counterfeit UPC, EAN, JAN, RFID, EPC, and/or equivalent number or first digits, and further includes a list of key descriptive text or numbers found on a product or a product's packaging that will either corroborate or contradict the real brand name with the brand encoded in the UPC, EAN, JAN, RFID EPC, and/or equivalent number. The invention allows a transaction if the item is not found in the database of suspect or counterfeit items, or if all of the identifiers match a record in the database; otherwise, the transaction is denied.