Pose-Part Object Re-Identification Under Large Pose Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional re-identification (Re-ID) models struggle with large pose variations and clutter backgrounds, leading to inaccurate object re-identification due to non-rigid pose changes and insufficient consideration of local part information, especially in multi-camera object tracking scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a pose part-based model (PPbM) that combines global and local representations using a neural network framework, leveraging accurate keypoint pose estimation to seamlessly handle large pose variations and reduce clutter background impact, enabling precise object re-identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional holistic appearance based re-ID models are used, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot capture large pose variations of objects due to clutter background introduced by non-rigid pose motions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-ID accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the object into multiple pose parts (e.g., head, torso, limbs) and models each part separately using localized bounding boxes and part-specific features. This segmentation allows the system to handle large pose variations by focusing on invariant local characteristics rather than relying on holistic appearance that changes with pose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing and feature extraction methods to different pose parts of the object. Each part is modeled with localized representations that capture its specific characteristics, enabling the system to maintain accuracy despite overall pose changes. The local part information is weighted and aggregated to form the final re-ID representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If aligned re-ID methods based on local grid modeling are used, then the processing is simplified, but each grid has the same size and contribution, failing to handle clutter background information from large pose variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-ID accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different weights and contributions to different pose parts based on their relevance and reliability for re-ID. Important parts (e.g., head, torso) have higher weights while less discriminative parts have lower weights. This differential treatment allows the system to focus on informative regions and ignore cluttered background areas, improving accuracy without uniform processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves from a uniform 2D grid modeling approach to a multi-dimensional pose-part based representation. By introducing part-specific bounding boxes, keypoint coordinates, and hierarchical part relationships, the system creates a richer feature space that better captures object identity despite pose variations and background clutter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If triplet based methods are used, then the training approach is simplified, but local part information is not considered, which is crucial for non-rigid large pose variation re-ID tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-ID accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the object into multiple pose parts and extracts local features for each part (e.g., CNN features from part-specific regions, keypoint features). These local part features are then aggregated to form the overall object representation, enabling the system to capture identity information that is invariant to pose changes while maintaining a training framework similar to triplet-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If classification loss is used for re-ID network training, then the training objective is clear, but it does not separate the margin between positive pairs and negative pairs effectively, and requires sufficient examples per category which is not true for re-ID datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-ID accuracyVSAvoidmargin separation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a metric learning component that acts as an intermediary between the feature extraction network and the classification objective. This metric learning layer learns to embed objects in a feature space where distances reflect semantic similarity, effectively creating margins between positive and negative pairs without requiring explicit class labels for each pose variation. This intermediary transformation enables effective discrimination with limited data per category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260010792A1Object re-identification using pose part based models
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 INTEL CORP
  • US20260010792A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010792A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010792A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example apparatus for re-identifying objects includes an image receiver to receive a first image and a second image of an object with an identity. The apparatus also includes a fused model generator to fuse a global representation of the object with local representations of pose parts of the object to generate a fused representation of the object based on the first image. The apparatus further includes an object re-identifier to re-identify the object with the identity in the second image based on the fused representation.