Position Switch Actuator and Locking Mechanism Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing position switches face challenges in achieving reliable switching behavior with a minimal component structure, particularly in separating actuation and locking mechanisms, which often require high magnetic forces and complex coil designs to ensure safe locking and unlocking, especially in scenarios where power failure affects accessibility and safety.

Innovation Solution

A position switch design that separates the actuation and locking mechanisms, using a plunger to block rotatable blocking elements via spring or magnetic force, allowing for secure locking and unlocking based on the actuator's presence, with the plunger attached to different active surfaces in rest and operating positions, enabling non-positive blocking and form-fitting connections to manage rotational movements and power states effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If magnetic force drive is used for locking and triggering switching elements, then locking reliability is improved, but device complexity and power consumption increase due to high-power coils being necessary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidcoil design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the locking mechanism into two independent parts: a magnetic drive system for actuating the tumbler, and a separate spring-based locking system. The spring-loaded locking element provides the locking force independently of the magnetic drive, eliminating the need for high-power coils while maintaining reliable locking through the mechanical spring mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the magnetic force drive with a spring-based mechanical system for the locking function. The spring-loaded locking element provides reliable locking without requiring high-power magnetic fields, thus reducing coil complexity and power consumption while maintaining locking reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If mechanical connection between actuator and switching elements is maintained, then switching reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to long switching paths and high switching forces required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching reliabilityVSAvoidswitching force requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the switching function from the mechanical actuation path. The actuator mechanically actuates the tumbler, but the switching elements are triggered by the magnetic field changes during tumbling, not by direct mechanical connection. This eliminates long switching paths and high switching force requirements while maintaining reliable switching through magnetic field detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If guard locking is implemented with spring force drive, then ease of operation is improved during power failure, but device complexity increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility during power failureVSAvoidcomponent quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the spring-based actuation system with the locking mechanism. The same spring-loaded system that actuates the tumbler also provides the locking force through the locking element. This integration eliminates the need for separate high-power magnetic coils, reducing device complexity while maintaining ease of operation during power failures through the spring-based system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures reliable and secure locking and unlocking, reduces the need for high-power coils, allows for a smaller and more versatile position switch design, and maintains accessibility during power failures by decoupling the actuating mechanism from the drive, thereby enhancing safety and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the plunger is provided in the operating position for attachment to an active surface of the first blocking element and in the rest position for attachment to an active surface of the second blocking element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The actuator can be blocked by the magnetic force drive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP1876622B1position switch
Publication Date: 2010.09.29 SIEMENS AG
  • EP1876622B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP1876622B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP1876622B1 patent drawingFigure 7

AI summary

The switch has a follower (1), where the follower is movable over a rotary locking element (3) by an actuator (2), from a rest position into an operating position. Another rotary locking element (5) blocks the former rotary check element by the follower. The follower is provided in operating position for accumulation of an effective area of the former locking element and in rest position for accumulation of an effective area of the latter locking element.