Post Hole Digger Safety Guards and Torque Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing post hole diggers lack proper safety features, which can lead to hazards from loose clothing or objects getting caught in moving parts, posing risks to users and bystanders.

Innovation Solution

Integration of safety guards and torque limiting means, such as shear bolts or slip clutches, to prevent access to rotating parts during operation and ensure guards are properly aligned before the device can function, combined with tamper-resistant fasteners and logic control mechanisms to prevent operation when guards are not in place.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If safety guards are integrated to cover rotating parts, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety guard is divided into multiple segments that can rotate independently around the driveline. This segmentation allows the guard to cover rotating parts effectively while maintaining simplicity in the overall structure, as each segment is a simple arc-shaped barrier rather than a complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety guard is designed to rotate with the driveline rather than remaining stationary. This dynamic design ensures continuous coverage of rotating parts while simplifying the structure by eliminating the need for complex mounting mechanisms, as the guard naturally follows the rotation of the driveline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If torque limiting means are added to prevent over-torque conditions, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The torque limiting mechanism uses sacrificial shear bolts that are designed to break under excessive torque conditions. This disposable approach provides reliable torque limiting without complex mechanisms, as the bolts are simple, inexpensive components that can be easily replaced after failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The shear bolts are pre-installed in critical torque transmission points to provide advance protection against over-torque conditions. This beforehand cushioning ensures that if excessive torque occurs, the bolts will fail safely before damaging more critical components, thereby improving reliability without adding complex protective mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If logic control mechanisms are implemented to prevent operation without guards, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The logic control mechanism uses sensors to detect whether safety guards are properly positioned and provides feedback to the control system. This feedback ensures that the driveline cannot operate without guards, improving safety while maintaining ease of operation through automatic detection rather than manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The logic control system automatically monitors guard positioning and controls driveline operation without requiring manual intervention from the operator. This self-service approach improves safety by eliminating the need for operators to manually verify guard positions, while simultaneously maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If tamper-resistant fasteners are used to secure guards, then safety is improved, but ease of repair deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of repair
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system replaces traditional mechanical fasteners with specialized tamper-resistant fasteners that require specific tools or procedures for removal. This substitution provides enhanced security against unauthorized removal while maintaining ease of repair through the use of standardized special-purpose fastening mechanisms that are still relatively simple to service with appropriate tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8899353B2Post hole digger with integrated safety features
Publication Date: 2014.12.02 SPEECO INC
  • US8899353B2 patent drawing
  • US8899353B2 patent drawing
  • US8899353B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide safety features for a post hole digger, such as for attachment to a tractor or other utility device. The post hole digger has a boom and a yoke for pivotally connecting to the tractor or similar device, a driveline for transmitting rotational energy, and an auger for forming holes in a ground or floor surface. Rotating features of the post hole digger are isolated by various guard members, thereby enhancing the safety of the device.